SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
WCOM
An SI Board Since July 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
11568 152 0 WCOM
Emcee:  Paul Berggren Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
11268Dear FNS: I am too impatient to await his Judgement day, I say the Feds should bJDN-7/12/2002
11267<i>You weren't impressed that he cried in church? Charles Tutt (SM) &ltejek-7/12/2002
11266Tejek and R.D. Buschman: Thank you for your comments to my to my post. I reaFNS-7/12/2002
11265You weren't impressed that he cried in church? Charles Tutt (SM)Charles Tutt-7/12/2002
11264<i>It could be straightened out a lot if Ebbers could be forced to answer paul t-7/12/2002
11263<i>man this is ugly... one would think we are talking about a dinky littletejek-7/12/2002
11262Some Questions For Bernie Dan Ackman, 07.12.02, 8:37 AM ET forbes.com NEW YORKJakeStraw-7/12/2002
11261man this is ugly... one would think we are talking about a dinky little sh*thousDEER HUNTER-7/12/2002
11260<i>If WCOME files for BK, wouldn't shareholders still hold their stocktejek-7/12/2002
11259FNS, it was I who mentioned Covad. They're back out of BK, restructured and Oeconomicus-7/12/2002
11258If WCOME files for BK, wouldn't shareholders still hold their stock in the cFNS-7/12/2002
11257<i>On a happier note the news out of Dell & JNPR should make for somettejek-7/11/2002
11256Dear Charles: I really dont know enough about how the current debt is set up to JDN-7/11/2002
11255Tejek, et.al.: <i>Just reported by CNBC: Sidgmore just told the WSJ thatJohn Curtis-7/11/2002
11254<i>I've got a couple thousand shares left just in case it ever comes btejek-7/11/2002
11253RDB: One VERY good reason for WCOM to avoid BK is to keep their contracts with Jaknik2-7/11/2002
11252Well, duh ... I think they said only a few days ago they had enough cash to getCharles Tutt-7/11/2002
11251Just reported by CNBC: Sidgmore just told the WSJ that BK for WCOM is becomingtejek-7/11/2002
11250Paul, BK does not necessarily mean wiping out the pre-BK shareholders, but it woOeconomicus-7/11/2002
11249I had forgotten about your banking background. So how do you see this playing oCharles Tutt-7/11/2002
11248Could be they've written off the shareholder! Why give a dog a bone on the paul t-7/11/2002
11247I'm not a banker, don't even play one on TV, but it does make all the sefurrfu-7/11/2002
11246Dear Charles: Well, speaking as a Banker I would welcome a Corp. suspending diviJDN-7/11/2002
11245I just sold most of mine. I coulda, shoulda, woulda done it yesterday. I thinkCharles Tutt-7/11/2002
11244I think total market cap right now is somewhere around $600 million. I suspect Charles Tutt-7/10/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News