SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
FORE Inc.
An SI Board Since February 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
12559 26 0 FORE
Emcee:  Pascal A. Mons Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
11284 <<i>Why would any Co. buy FORE now at a premium when they could have pWTSherman-3/24/1999
11283 Who said, "there's no such thing as a free lunch?" I believe it Bob-3/24/1999
11282 Exactly. Ishmael, you're right on. I still go back to the BAY takeover byjohn dodson-3/24/1999
11281 <i>I certainly wouldn't have a problem with pretty much anything oveRiskmgmt-3/24/1999
11280 Re:<i>The companies would have announced by now. </i> Beach, youRiskmgmt-3/24/1999
11279 Beach, It took 6 days of heavy trading with Xylan prior to the actual deal goinNetworkInvestor-3/24/1999
11278 Re: i don't know that they would be assured stockholders approval under $35john dodson-3/24/1999
11277 The reality is that the timing of an announcement has more to do with settling Ishmael-3/24/1999
11276 The companies would have announced by now. thebeach-3/24/1999
11275 I am now convinced that Fore will not be bought out at all.Unless someone comesRiskmgmt-3/24/1999
11274 I am now convinced that Fore will not be bought out at all.Unless someone comesthebeach-3/24/1999
11273 Re:<i> $25 is a stretch.</i> Take a look at this.http://www.tradepRiskmgmt-3/24/1999
11272 Who would have been able to buy FORE at $15.00? Cooper would never take that liElmer Flugum-3/24/1999
11271 <<Why would any Co. buy FORE now at a premium when they could have pickedDave-3/24/1999
11270 Remember LU could have bought ASND for a song also.Companies change from year tthebeach-3/24/1999
11269 You'd be VERY lucky to get more than 25... Even 25 is a stretch. Why wouldBilly-3/24/1999
11268 >>i think we all would be happy with anything over 26<< Hello Tim,contax-3/24/1999
11267 Just out of curiousity, do you find these posts to be "classic Cisco behavJorj X Mckie-3/24/1999
11266 Hey!!!! <i> You're just showing the classic Cisco behavior.&The Phoenix-3/24/1999
11265 I'd rather be stupid than the lame butt-kisser you've proven to be. YouSibaris-3/24/1999
11264 FORE - shake, rattle and roll ~~~ ;) Mavrick-3/24/1999
11263 I went with May expiration...just in case... Jorj X Mckie-3/24/1999
11262 Somebody should post that on Yahoo!... I would but I wouldn't have a clue MrThesp-3/24/1999
11261 You dood! Still hangin onto mine. This pup will go. However I'm holding The Phoenix-3/24/1999
11260 i bought more at 17 1/16 Tim Luke-3/24/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):