SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
LUMM - Lumenon Innovative Lightwave Technology Inc.
An SI Board Since February 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2484 45 0 LUMM
Emcee:  Currency Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1134 Intelligent investing...well done!!...I have already done the same, and am longthe Chief-11/15/1999
1133 I just sold enough at $23 to cover my total original investment net of taxes. SecularBull-11/15/1999
1132 All the more reason to keep those eyeballs ultra peeled and focused on yer baskJohn Curtis-11/15/1999
1131 A quick note on "volume" Remember, NASDAQ double counts their volume.the Chief-11/15/1999
1130 Syl: If LUMM's product is real then this is basically how I see them. LUMJohn Curtis-11/15/1999
1129 Chief: You've just managed to touch on the ONE thing that keeps me from waJohn Curtis-11/15/1999
1128 Hang on to your hat! LUMM invention is bigger then we think. I'ts almost aSyl98-11/15/1999
1127 This train is smokin!!!!!!!!!!!!LUMM 22 15/16ths the Chief-11/15/1999
1126 <i>It sounds very good, however being limited to $2.5 Million in revenue the Chief-11/15/1999
1125 Chief: Thanks for taking the time to summarize your visit. It sounds very goodJohn Curtis-11/15/1999
1124 From RB board. One Stop Shopping for LUMM Info! I've posted the SEC filiRCDTD-11/15/1999
1123 Lumenon visit Monday 8th Novemeber Myself and another SI member arrived at 1the Chief-11/14/1999
1122 Of course, I agree, Curtis. That's good advice - one must read the SEC 10jim heger-11/14/1999
1121 Since you asked me, and there seems to be some speculation about what I think iCurtis E. Bemis-11/13/1999
1120 Thanks, Jim, I'll be there! I was talking to a chap the other day about LUDon Johnstone-11/13/1999
1119 Don, you're the senior statesman here and you've got to be pleased wijim heger-11/13/1999
1118 ++How bout you?++ Well, Jim, not that you asked me directly, but I'll answDon Johnstone-11/13/1999
1117 you bet and I liked what I read. Wrt RB, I've found good info there. Gotjim heger-11/13/1999
1116 There may be an active discussion on RB for LUMM but it appears to be a lot of Curtis E. Bemis-11/13/1999
1115 Those interested in an active and informative discussion of LUMM will find it jim heger-11/13/1999
1114 <i>Anyone with current information on this company who would be willing tCurtis E. Bemis-11/13/1999
1113 Anyone with current information on this company who would be willing to share iHawaii60-11/13/1999
1112 Looks like a non-event. 175,000 shares is peanuts.Ted M-11/13/1999
1111 <i>Neither is the SEC 10-12G Have you gone over that ??</i> No I hfaro-11/13/1999
1110 Here is the answer: newstraders.comSyl98-11/12/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News