SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Corning Incorporated (GLW)
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2260 230 0 GLW
Emcee:  Asymmetric Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1135considering they had a charge and eps is now @$1.20....this is a company to own Steve Warkentin-1/7/2001
1134This is true, but there are other companies growing at 20% to 30% with a pe halfneverenough-1/7/2001
1133Based upon estimates, the company was expected to grow at about 22%. Now being it2-1/7/2001
1132<i>I don't think that 20 to 30 percent top and bottom line growth is wneverenough-1/7/2001
1131It sounds to me that GLW does not want any more pounding of their stock on hysteFR1-1/7/2001
1130Henry, these comments concern me too, but this is what their 2000 projections we16yearcycle-1/7/2001
1129GLW: this Sunday is an exceptional case, earning released for GLW dailynews.yahokha vu-1/7/2001
1128At Corning, Ideas Now Match Markets By CLAUDIA H. DEUTSCH The New York Times JSam Citron-1/7/2001
1127I don't think that 20 to 30 percent top and bottom line growth is what the sJohnny Canuck-1/7/2001
1126Positive NY Times article home-news.excite.com $7 billion in revenue! NEW YORFR1-1/7/2001
1125Interesting how journalists make JDSU's acquisition of SDLI a <i>fait pat mudge-1/6/2001
1124kha vu, Agreed. Corning is about as solid as any high tech company can get in tIbexx-1/6/2001
1123GLW: have no position in GLW. But traded GLW a lot in 2000. Here is an interestkha vu-1/6/2001
1122dawg, Agreed. As I stated in an earlier post, comparison of the current sellinIbexx-12/30/2000
1121Insider selling is not out of the usual for year end and actually pretty good. NJunkyardawg-12/30/2000
1120The best possible reason for the poor performance is that I have not sold this oSpreck-12/28/2000
1119but it occurs to me too, that we have guidance. Post # 1106. so until somethingJerry Miller-12/27/2000
1118Hi Stephen, seems it was our turn today with Cramer. the Yahoo boards (http://mJerry Miller-12/27/2000
1117passpass, I looked at those numbers too. Compared with the historical pattern, Ibexx-12/27/2000
1116From yahoo, but by looking at the chart, it appears GLW is probably a safe buy apass pass-12/27/2000
1115Re. <i> insiders selling</i> Numbers and URL - if you will? TIA, IIbexx-12/27/2000
1114Massive insider selling (eom)pass pass-12/27/2000
1113Anyone have a clue why Glw performed so weakly in today's up market (especiaStephen M. DeMoss-12/27/2000
1112January 22nd approximate earnings release date. quicken.excite.comJerry Miller-12/17/2000
1111Didn't J. Cramer call JDSU "just don't sell us" about 9 monthspass pass-12/17/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):