SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
Maxam Gold Corp. OBB:MXAM
An SI Board Since January 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
11603 48 0 MXAM
Emcee:  Richard Mazzarella Type:  Moderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
11378You appear to be correct that occurred many years ago when Maxam failed to provicprecher-1/26/2008
11377"story about the failure of one lab to complete its tests?" (or) it dd:oug-1/25/2008
11376Desertdirt, Very nice simile the only problem is that Maxam has only produced lecprecher-1/25/2008
11375re: "has anyone here talked to [preseident of Maxam] Steves" Once agad:oug-1/24/2008
11374I read this thread from time to time since I own a pretty large number of Maxam bistineau_la-1/24/2008
11373cprecher - Yes I do!!! I would not be involved if I did not believe that Maxam hDESERTDIRT-1/24/2008
11372DesertDirt do you really believe your posts?cprecher-1/24/2008
11371From: cprecher To: d:oug April 3, 2006 Maxam Gold Prez Steeves announces gold od:oug-1/23/2008
11370You appear to be correct. I was just looking at the Maxam site and I noticed thecprecher-1/23/2008
11369Yes, as so far Maxam's History has repeated itself in failure over and over,d:oug-1/22/2008
11368While we are all waiting for the second labs results does any know what happenedcprecher-1/22/2008
11367re: "Could it be that even they do not want to throw more money into a sunkd:oug-1/14/2008
11366With the continuous posts by the providers of inside information it appears stracprecher-1/14/2008
11365Doug, I apologize, I have stated this several times, The assays being done this paunch13-1/11/2008
11364Doug, I think you are not playing with a full deck Johnpaunch13-1/11/2008
11363From: paunch13... "The BIG difference [pog is 4X] higher..." Gosh Johd:oug-1/11/2008
11362Richard, The BIG difference is that now the price of gold is four times higher tpaunch13-1/11/2008
11361Hi John, MXAM has had good assays in the past and the price is currently less thRichard Mazzarella-1/11/2008
11360Doug, I understand , you want something to be announced and so do I, however Mxapaunch13-1/11/2008
11359So you think Maxam is "good" not to be accountable for these press reld:oug-1/10/2008
11358DesertDirt, I think you are right, If Mxam is such a bad company why don't Dpaunch13-1/10/2008
11357Desaert, I think you are right, If Mxam is such a bac company why don't Dougpaunch13-1/10/2008
11356d:oug - No, I will never say that I have been lied to!!! If you are so sure abouDESERTDIRT-1/9/2008
11355re: "...what type of excuse the inside information posters will give?"d:oug-1/9/2008
11354I wonder what type of excuse the inside information posters will give. Of coursecprecher-1/9/2008
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News