SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
SI Beta Site Launch - 7/01/99
An SI Board Since July 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
2340 25 0
Emcee:  David Lawrence Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1140 <i>Now the developer has decided that's it's time to develop, to Zeuspaul-8/1/1999
1139 <<agree with you about jbe's post - #reply-10754633 >> Joan dEric L-8/1/1999
1138 But Cheeky - it wasn't a park. It was a wonderful vacant lot on which we usmarcos-8/1/1999
1137 Think of SI as a park. The Original SI Park: We were here when the trees, flowCheeky Kid-7/31/1999
1136 Ah, the browsemaster program ... well, each to their own ... i suppose there ismarcos-7/31/1999
1135 << the imposition of an ignore button is not being threatened at this timEric L-7/31/1999
1134 "<i>...but not a single argument against the addition of an "igmarcos-7/31/1999
1133 Michelle, << FUBA >> Love It! .. and I thought telecom had a lotEric L-7/31/1999
1132 Michelle, interesting notion. But wouldn't those 10 "key users" sjbe-7/31/1999
1131 Well... thats what we used to call them, the other half are the business analysLizzie Tudor-7/31/1999
1130 Michelle, << Well, I would say in the future SI should identify 10 "Eric L-7/31/1999
1129 Susan, << I agree with your post that most of the complaints about the nEric L-7/31/1999
1128 <i>In one instance, you are actually talking about restoring a feature thJohn Biddle-7/31/1999
1127 <i>Now this isn't rocket science or anything, but it is man hours andJohn Biddle-7/31/1999
1126 John, I like your suggestions. In one instance, you are actually talking abojbe-7/31/1999
1125 <I>I disagree completely with the idea that we have to come together to mLizzie Tudor-7/31/1999
1124 I find it disconcerting to see/jump over "who wrote" at the top of eaSr K-7/31/1999
1123 "<i>...in the future SI should identify 10 "key" users liPCModem-7/31/1999
1122 "<i>And if they just dropped useful features by accident, then whatPCModem-7/31/1999
1121 <i>"Option" is the key word.</i> Now, there is a novel PCModem-7/31/1999
1120 <i>Peripherally related to this is the issue that some people can't mJohn Biddle-7/31/1999
1119 <i>I am opposed to an ignore button. While there are advantages, the disaJohn Biddle-7/31/1999
1118 <i>How about the ability to have two SubjectMarks pages, not just one?<Lizzie Tudor-7/31/1999
1117 Excellent post JBE, one I hope SI takes to heart. Content is indeed king here John Biddle-7/31/1999
1116 Well, I would say in the future SI should identify 10 "key" users likLizzie Tudor-7/31/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):