SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Applied Magnetics Corp
An SI Board Since September 1995
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
12298 24 0 APM
Emcee:  Raymond Thomas Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
11498 actually, there was accumulation in APM yesterday. But the question is was it Epics-3/20/1998
11497 Come on James, educate us! That's what these threads are all about. Id loT Bowl-3/20/1998
11496 Attitude adjustment for appro: Thanks Thanh for reminding me there is a big diappro-3/20/1998
11495 Re: Short Ratios Jim Cramer from thestreet.com has some interesting comments aPierre-X-3/20/1998
11494 >>Aug 13, 1997 Gave us this bold, now cold prediction: >>APM will hAlienTech-3/20/1998
11493 Zeev; Thats a good question, I got my rough idea but some factors I know I haveJames F. Hopkins-3/20/1998
11492 Jim, I was in CYRX in the very low teens as well, and the short position was onZeev Hed-3/19/1998
11491 I doubt it :-)James F. Hopkins-3/19/1998
11490 It would educate us.Spots-3/19/1998
11489 >>How'd someone so young learn to be so cynical? Oh yeah, Crisman... Spots-3/19/1998
11488 >Jim, would you mind explaining how APM's balance sheet is good? > &gFrodo Baxter-3/19/1998
11487 What good would it do ?James F. Hopkins-3/19/1998
11486 Jim, would you mind explaining how APM's balance sheet is good? Brian PBrian Lempel-3/19/1998
11485 Stitch; I was hoping to get in as cheap as I could, and had just given up catchJames F. Hopkins-3/19/1998
11484 agree that a good short at 12+ but why still at 10+. still losing in '98 bput2rich-3/19/1998
11483 <i>>>..if for no other reason than she is over shorted. It never faappro-3/19/1998
11482 Jim, re: Your play on the short cover I wouldn't dispute what you are doinStitch-3/19/1998
11481 Stitch; I'm in APM for one reason..she has 40% of her shares shorted..all tJames F. Hopkins-3/19/1998
11480 Dave, Your are quite right to point out that the number of heads and platters Stitch-3/19/1998
11479 Steve, Sorry for the late reply. I have been out of town since early Monday. AStitch-3/19/1998
11478 The labels lie on those old Caviars because the drive lies to the bios so the bSpots-3/18/1998
11477 There is a fundamental change underway in the transition to MR heads. MR and GMDave Chanoux-3/18/1998
11476 I'm not buying now either, for virtually the same reasons. At least I know Spots-3/17/1998
11475 Dennis, I also wouldn't buy right now. When a stock is doing something toDonald Isenhower-3/17/1998
11474 Stitch, If Samsung is a customer then what are they getting, or going to get? Steve Pick-3/16/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News