SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING
An SI Board Since February 2002
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
21057 16 0
Emcee:  Peter Dierks Type:  Moderated
Previous 100 | Next 100 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
11533France rallies against Le Pen About 250,000 marched against Le PeLazarus_Long-5/1/2002
11532Girl missing a year without anyone reporting it cnn.com May 1, Lazarus_Long-5/1/2002
11531Key Republican Backs Cloning in Research nytimes.com By SHERYL GAY STOLBERG Lazarus_Long-5/1/2002
11530Yes, everything is abloom, as far as I have noticed. It is a lovely, sweet, someNeocon-5/1/2002
11529I saw three. They were all to you. When my Dad was losing an argument, he'J. C. Dithers-5/1/2002
11528Okey doke. Beautiful day here today, though cool. Our lilacs are about to bloomPoet-5/1/2002
11527I have been busy, I must have missed that (the request). But it is okay with me.Neocon-5/1/2002
11526You could, but it wouldn't be quite right, I think. For one thing, there werNeocon-5/1/2002
11525Have you seen Laz's three or four posts saying he wish we'd move onto soPoet-5/1/2002
11524I never said it bothered me. I think that probably most of the workers would havBald Eagle-5/1/2002
11523Neo, we've been asked to conclude this conversation and I'm going to comPoet-5/1/2002
11522I suggest you read what I posted on Reisman, Then. And we've been asked to Poet-5/1/2002
11521Tim, we've been asked to end this discussion and I'm going to comply.Poet-5/1/2002
11520Neo brought her up. But we've been asked to move onto another topic: MessaPoet-5/1/2002
11519<i>"Could Bill Gates have become as rich as he is without having manyone_less-5/1/2002
11518Is this where I needle you about Aristotle?one_less-5/1/2002
1151760 million? Where on earth did you get that number from?Bald Eagle-5/1/2002
11516Bill Gates is responsible for creating about 60 million jobs. What a shithead, hBill-5/1/2002
11515I am afraid that there are many contenders for Toon Town.....Neocon-5/1/2002
11514We should start a companion thread to A Century of Lions and call it A Century oTom Clarke-5/1/2002
11513<i>I'm a liberal Democrat. </i> That IS curable. :-) Maybe we Lazarus_Long-5/1/2002
11512I have no objection to trying to get decent data on sexual topics, and you may bNeocon-5/1/2002
11511<i>It seems odd to focus any debate on the social consequences of private J. C. Dithers-5/1/2002
11510Interesting. I have not been able to find anything on her that could be considerNeocon-5/1/2002
11509My sense is that while Kinsey did indeed compile a massive and impressive amountRick Julian-5/1/2002
11508NoBald Eagle-5/1/2002
11507<i> Eighteen thousand in itself eliminates a lot of the skew you seem to bTimF-5/1/2002
11506What does this Reisman woman have to do with anything? How does bringing her intTom Clarke-5/1/2002
11505What a stupid response. What's "hald your house".Bald Eagle-5/1/2002
11504It wasn't a boast, idiot.Bald Eagle-5/1/2002
11503THEN DON'T KEEP TALKING ABOUT IT! So how's the weather where you are? Lazarus_Long-5/1/2002
11502I am so freakin sick and tired of it, I could scream. Consider me finished withPoet-5/1/2002
11501Neo's post was long and Reisman has been thoroughly discredited. What was &Poet-5/1/2002
11500You know, I think we need another war or maybe an election theft to get off thisLazarus_Long-5/1/2002
11499Here's something else from that site: "Kinsey has admitted that his saPoet-5/1/2002
11498True, true.Rick Julian-5/1/2002
11497I'm so glad you brought up Judith Reisman. Here's some interesting readPoet-5/1/2002
11496But 26% (1,400) of Kinsey's alleged 5,300 white male subjects were already &Neocon-5/1/2002
11495excellent. :-)Poet-5/1/2002
11494Eighteen thousand in itself eliminates a lot of the skew you seem to be concernePoet-5/1/2002
11493<i> And here is where I get a long rebuttal from you about how this is wroTimF-5/1/2002
11492Here is where I say I have no problem with government money being spent for suchPoet-5/1/2002
11491<i> Eighteen thousand, Tim. </i> And this is supposed to mean tTimF-5/1/2002
11490<i> What do you think I think? </i> I was not sure. <i> HiTimF-5/1/2002
11489N+1Poet-5/1/2002
11488<i> How many times do you have to post that you don't like the word &#TimF-5/1/2002
11487He interviewed 18000 men, face-to-face and in depth in the mid forties. EighteenPoet-5/1/2002
11486Sorry to belabor this, but this is what I actually said: <i>I have not heNeocon-5/1/2002
11485<i> Kinsey was the first person to do anything that approached legitimate TimF-5/1/2002
11484Go away, little boy. I'm tired of your silly boasts.Lazarus_Long-5/1/2002
11483GREAT! You got God's 800 number? I want to congratulate him on implementinLazarus_Long-5/1/2002
11482What do <I>you</I> think I think? Hint: I'm a liberal DemocratPoet-5/1/2002
11481True, you appeared to wish to characterize them as flawless angels. It is best Lazarus_Long-5/1/2002
11480<i> I'm not "in" anything. I told you that I agree with the TimF-5/1/2002
11479How many times do you have to post that you don't like the word 'homophoPoet-5/1/2002
11478<i>Could Bill Gates have become as rich as he is without having many thousLazarus_Long-5/1/2002
11477<i> "Again homophobe and homophobia. They are sometimes used outside TimF-5/1/2002
11476<i><b>I'm sorry.</b></i> I missed your brilliance. Lazarus_Long-5/1/2002
11475Hello <I>Duh</I>thers, Now you're putting Alfred Kinsey down? Poet-5/1/2002
11474I don't need to. I had no problem reading your response. Your response did nBald Eagle-5/1/2002
11473<i> You can discuss these disgruntlements with someone else. I was only diTimF-5/1/2002
11472Yes, at least predominately......Neocon-5/1/2002
11471<i>Kinsey over- estimated because he used a skewed sample.</i> I beJ. C. Dithers-5/1/2002
11470Consult your ophthalmologist.Lazarus_Long-5/1/2002
11469I think I did already, check my other posts. A simple question here sure can getBald Eagle-5/1/2002
11468Oh. OK. Then you tell us your answer, Dr. Einstein.Lazarus_Long-5/1/2002
11467OK, we agree :-) BTW, some MSFT "millionaires" went bankrupt when the Bald Eagle-5/1/2002
11466By the way, I have been mulling this over, and I am baffled as to how objecting Neocon-5/1/2002
11465<i> The UN is too worried about Israel to stop the real nasty stuff. </TimF-5/1/2002
11464<i> In your statements there is an amazing ability to separate one set of TimF-5/1/2002
11463The answer wasn't directly answered because it was apparently rhetorical. TimF-5/1/2002
11462Actually, the situation is like this: Kinsey over- estimated because he used a sNeocon-5/1/2002
11461That wasn't my question. Where did you get that from? My question was: &quoBald Eagle-5/1/2002
11460The question "how about the right of people to the fruits of their labor?&qTimF-5/1/2002
11459"Princeton physicists are among the leaders of two international research cRick Julian-5/1/2002
11458<i> A body at rest tends to stay at rest.....</i> Correlating NewtonRick Julian-5/1/2002
11457Most people, even before reform, got off the dole in about 2 years. The problem Neocon-5/1/2002
11456As always, I am pleased.....Neocon-5/1/2002
11455Doubtless, it is possible to abuse power, and happens from time to time. I was mNeocon-5/1/2002
11454Life on the campus -- where we're at today in higher education <b>TouJ. C. Dithers-5/1/2002
11453The full text: accessatlanta.comRick Julian-5/1/2002
11452Defender of poor relieved of duties Testified he assumed his clients guilty, liaRick Julian-5/1/2002
11451The Barbarism Gene made 'em do it.......Neocon-5/1/2002
11450IMO, most of these folks think they are "doing the Lord's work" sojlallen-5/1/2002
11449That sounds an awful lot like Beanies. -g I know very little about the law. DPoet-5/1/2002
11448Yes. I see a lot of meritless pleadings being filed solely for the purposes of jlallen-5/1/2002
11447Wow. Why so? Are most of them young , eager save-the-world types?Poet-5/1/2002
11446A body at rest tends to stay at rest..... Universal truism....jlallen-5/1/2002
11445What's <b>your</b> excuse for being a parasitic worm? JLAjlallen-5/1/2002
11444<i>think it's appropriate for, some tax dollars to be used to pay publjlallen-5/1/2002
11443I'm not "in" anything. I told you that I agree with the concept, Poet-5/1/2002
11442We are in agreement here!Poet-5/1/2002
11441Good morning Neo: <I> What point is that? That the rich are bad because tPoet-5/1/2002
11440The Onion has the solution, as ever: theonion.com <i><b>God Re-Flothames_sider-5/1/2002
11439No, that was somebody else's question. Get with the program!Bald Eagle-5/1/2002
11438No answer to the question that I could see.Bald Eagle-5/1/2002
11437No! It was an obfuscation. It was a very simple question, why so much problem anBald Eagle-5/1/2002
11436I see, my only mistake in life was being born to the wrong parents.Bald Eagle-5/1/2002
11435I was hoping you'd see that. hehehe :-)Poet-5/1/2002
11434<i>"Homophobe and homophobic</i>" So this is still new toSolon-5/1/2002
Previous 100 | Next 100 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):