SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
FORE Inc.
An SI Board Since February 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
12559 26 0 FORE
Emcee:  Pascal A. Mons Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
11534 The idea of Yahoo buying Fore isn't so ridiculous when you look at the valuTyphoon-4/4/1999
11533 Duh, let me see.... A bidding war. Do you take the lowest bid??? Twerps will sTyphoon-4/4/1999
11532 I just checked Datek, and it is the same as it was on thursday, 20 1/2 to 20 9Jeff O'Brien-4/4/1999
11531 I agree, the smell of headfake is in the air, I see an ask of 13 3/4 on datek&#G.F.-4/4/1999
11530 Enough with the rumors...What happened to Intel and Ericsson? Fore announces eJoe Mavrides-4/4/1999
11529Message 8699301Tim Luke-4/4/1999
11528 I agree that all the stories seem to be citing the CURRENT valuation of FORE anDGG-4/4/1999
11527 jach's great prediction: (wow! more than 50% in less than a month for FOREjach-4/4/1999
11526 zero sense ? looks like another no-clue half-brain out-of-lunch person, sad. Ifjach-4/4/1999
11525 Wasn't NSCP takeover of AOL at about the same valuation as what NSCP closedNandu-4/4/1999
11524 Micom came in for lower than the price that it was trading on the day that it wJorj X Mckie-4/4/1999
11523 I think the British papers are repeating the rumor that first appeared on CNBC,Nandu-4/4/1999
11522 I do not think I have seen a takeover target EVER lower than what the current pRich-4/4/1999
11521 If you guys remember, David Faber of CNBC had a rumor 2 weeks ago (when things jas cooper-4/4/1999
11520 Ya gotta point there. Anything much under $25, and I'd vote heck no. -Johjohn dodson-4/4/1999
11519 <<i>Say it ain't so, Joe!<</i> <b>It ain't so!WTSherman-4/4/1999
11518 Talk about TAKE-UNDER! Maybe the numbers were quoted wrong. I sure hope so. Mjohn dodson-4/4/1999
11517 Steven, There is absolutely no leverage for YHOO or anyone else in that categoWTSherman-4/4/1999
11516 jach, Sorry, but I do not see the synergies here for Yahoo to buy Fore Systemspolarisnh-4/4/1999
11515 The Times UK Article the-times.co.ukKenneth Plunk-4/4/1999
11514 Here is the Dow Jones version of the same story Tim---- April 4, 1999 DowLTK007-4/4/1999
11513 YHOO is a much better suitor, price-wise as well as looking it from techno-viewjach-4/4/1999
11512 U.K.'s GEC Mulls Buying Electronics Maker, Papers Say (Update1) BloomberTim Luke-4/4/1999
11511 Kath-- actually I am really hoping for 25... If it were GE all the better as thCaptain Jack-4/4/1999
11510 Your math is actually wrong. Read again: <i>"almost completed talksSibaris-4/4/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News