SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
Advanced Micro Devices - Off Topic
An SI Board Since June 2002
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
1141 14 0
Emcee:  jjayxxxx Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
116Of course the unfortunate truth is that plantlife IS a complete moron and does bdougSF30-10/3/2006
115i totally agree that any such discussion belongs here or in PMs onlyDRBES-10/3/2006
114>> Please do feel free to try me. No need to try. Your line of reasoningSarmad Y. Hermiz-10/3/2006
113Sarmad, As you are at least too naive to see the difference between your + drjRink-10/3/2006
112Yes, although apparently I am not even allowed to link to posts here which contadougSF30-9/30/2006
111<B>EXCUSE ME...I AM LOOKING FOR THE dougSF30 THREAD...AM I GETTING CLOSE ?DRBES-9/30/2006
110muzosi, don't be such a whiny ass. His post WAS stupid.dougSF30-9/30/2006
109Indeed, I have nothing but the utmost respect for you.dougSF30-9/30/2006
108Ok, that is just plain STUPID. The end user does not care how Intel gets 4 coresdougSF30-9/30/2006
107Wow, plantlife (an apt choice of name) must be happy on the SI board-- he's dougSF30-9/30/2006
106Yes, both on 65nm. 1 QC K8L is larger than 1 QC (MCM) Core2. K8L: 289mm^2 : 4dougSF30-9/29/2006
105<i>K8L will be just slightly larger than 2core Conro</i> Hardly. ItdougSF30-9/29/2006
104re: <i>You should not ALLOW votes that have no justification for taking plRink-9/28/2006
103Doug, <i>I know! Imagine... you think $500 parking tickets are outrageousJoe NYC-9/28/2006
102<i>You believe that the reasoning / rules behind you ban were flawed, but dougSF30-9/28/2006
101Doug, <i>If I'm going to get banned for bullshit reasons, then the moJoe NYC-9/28/2006
100 I guess it depends on whether you think Rink's job is to enforce his interTimF-9/28/2006
99<i>Still you maintain your own posts in the past have absolutely nothing tdougSF30-9/28/2006
98Doug, Mas has been suspended twice (more than anyone else since I took over). ThRink-9/28/2006
97Joe, regarding your post: <i>I mind you crying to the moderators when somdougSF30-9/28/2006
96<i>If you really believe that the tone in your posts and the amount of youdougSF30-9/26/2006
95<i>If you were continuously insulted, even for somewhat reasonable reasonsbrushwud-9/22/2006
94Re: Victim Doug, If you really believe that the tone in your posts and the amRink-9/22/2006
93<i>It didn't show in the comments I got from the voting process.</idougSF30-9/21/2006
92Doug, I'm not going to repeat myself. I explained why I made an exception wiRink-9/21/2006
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):