SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Corning Incorporated (GLW)
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2260 230 0 GLW
Emcee:  Asymmetric Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1160Briefing.com highlights GLW. The question here was whether the Market would put Dave Gore-1/8/2001
1159Might be an arb opp!!! NASD: finance.yahoo.com Frankfurt: de.finance.yahoo.com BSharck-1/8/2001
1158Dale, thanks for the link. Lightreading has some very good info. eom. larryLarry S.-1/8/2001
1157<<I don't think that 20 to 30 percent top and bottom line growth is whBDR-1/8/2001
1156Frankfurt exchange is NOT a good proxy for US market, especially on issues basedIbexx-1/8/2001
1155Down 5% on the Frankfurt exchange. Could be good entry point the AM. No positiSharck-1/8/2001
1154Overseas opening -ve.Doug-1/8/2001
1153From GLW's website: 1.17 EPS earnings; beats by 1 penny and beats their own Dave Gore-1/8/2001
1152...so they should be buying back their own stock back on the open market...rightStoctrash-1/8/2001
1151True, but the auto industry is not growing earnings by 50% a year either, these neverenough-1/8/2001
1150You can't compare apples with peaches. The auto industry has even lower p/Ibexx-1/7/2001
1149I don't think PE ratio matters in the art of investing. It's all about mpass pass-1/7/2001
1148To name a few: ADCT, CPN, AMAT, C, COF, SBC, TLAB, XLNXneverenough-1/7/2001
1147Bong: can you name some of them? MSFT and INTC are not growing ANYWHERE close tGary Kao-1/7/2001
1146I have followed your posts. You are objective. Thanks.turnmore-1/7/2001
1145Fair enough. My attitutude also. Don't forget the bold print <READ AT OWIbexx-1/7/2001
1144Ibexx, I'm all for models, but I only appreciate those that are credible. Tturnmore-1/7/2001
1143A model based upon parameters cited therein. I am not privy to the mathematicalIbexx-1/7/2001
1142A very optimistic target. I'd be happy with $80. Where's the reasoning?turnmore-1/7/2001
1141Welcome back.Bruce Ravelson-1/7/2001
1140A six-month projection for GLW:<b> (read at your own risk)</b> PARAIbexx-1/7/2001
1139<i>Now with this earning anouncement, where does GLW open and could it savpat mudge-1/7/2001
1138I did some numbers crunching, and it confirmed what I always "thought"Ibexx-1/7/2001
1137Thanks. Most of the posts on GLW especially on YHOO boards appear to be a mass esteve mamus-1/7/2001
1136Franz and thread, A few thoughts re. NYTimes vs. IBD and others: --IBD is the Ibexx-1/7/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News