SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
2000-Year of the Biotechs!
An SI Board Since December 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
1142 41 0
Emcee:  Arthur Radley Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
117 torben, what i stated earlier was not what i think was going to happen, but ratmact-1/20/2000
116 Take a look at TTP today....Whoa Nellie! I keep pounding the table on this one.Arthur Radley-1/20/2000
115 NABI is in my original model portfolio. I have always pondered the low valuatioArthur Radley-1/20/2000
114 Tex, I don't remember if it was you or Walter who first came up with it. ETorben Noerup Nielsen-1/20/2000
113 I heard the pounding and just added more NABI....thank me for that last trade aArthur Radley-1/20/2000
112 Tex, Time to pound on the table.... Buy NABI; it's looking better and bettTorben Noerup Nielsen-1/20/2000
111 INHL is a very interesting stock. Actually, it has an association with one of mArthur Radley-1/20/2000
110 TexasDude, <<What a day for biotechs in general and my model portfolioShawn Donahue-1/20/2000
109 here's a biotech play for you IAAC;well at least when their international bjohnsto1-1/20/2000
108 Tex, The situation sounds serious enough that you might consider separate sleeTorben Noerup Nielsen-1/20/2000
107 Mact, I think you're right on with your earlier WWIII comment, but I'mTorben Noerup Nielsen-1/20/2000
106 This is why SDIX is in my model portfolio.....US food industry says biotech datArthur Radley-1/20/2000
105 I think we all should call Andrea Mitchell and let her do some pillow talking wArthur Radley-1/20/2000
104 agreed...gives us the 50 point move and move to tightening bias one time...thenmact-1/19/2000
103 Tex, >As for Greenspan...give us the 50 basis point move and let >us getTorben Noerup Nielsen-1/19/2000
102 ( the revenue stream ) A lack of revenue wasn't a problem for the Inets lasMike McFarland-1/19/2000
101 Jack, I don't have a link for Sturza. What he provides is a weekly fax inveArthur Radley-1/19/2000
100 Not familar with Sturza's. Do you have a link? Alot of money sitting on theJack Hartmann-1/19/2000
99 Jack, The only newsletter that I subscribe is to Sturza's. It is okay. The Arthur Radley-1/19/2000
98 Texas, Do you subscribe to any biotech newsletters. I agree that it was a good Jack Hartmann-1/19/2000
97 What a day for biotechs in general and my model portfolio...up over 30% in threArthur Radley-1/19/2000
96 Mike, CRA has Motley Fool followers pouring into to it. I don't see the revJack Hartmann-1/19/2000
95 Tex, I missed BONZ; my well ran dry :-) All I got was a bit of ELN which I thiTorben Noerup Nielsen-1/19/2000
94 Thanks Mike for HQH and for the link. BLUE Blue Snowshoe-1/19/2000
93 At least they shouldn't have problems getting patients to sign up for trialArthur Radley-1/19/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):