SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
Swift Energy (SFY)
An SI Board Since July 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1602 9 0 SFY
Emcee:  PuddleGlum Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1177Possible top signal came in for SFY on my system over the weekend, and it is alsYogizuna-9/11/2000
1176I only checked back to 1993 on OIL, so I missed the first run. And as was so apPuddleGlum-9/9/2000
1175puddle -- there was also a period in which OIL ran from 4 to 50 in less than a yarkay-9/9/2000
1174But Michael, I know you were here when it went from $29 to $5 in about 16 monthcherrypitter-9/9/2000
1173SFY has gone from the low of $5-6 to over 35, or 600+%. Not too shabby in 19 moThe Ox-9/9/2000
1172PG, OIL has had 2 one-year runs where they went up from (roughly) $5 to $50. Onfp_scientist-9/9/2000
1171Everybody!!! Enough sniping on this board! We're here to talk primarily aboPuddleGlum-9/9/2000
1170freakin' anglophile. SPAWNED=PROMULGATED=SPREAD=british colonists. Where arkay-9/8/2000
1169arkay- OT- Truth said it better, but I'd like to add my two cents. Your clLiatris Spicata-9/8/2000
1168PG- I can tough out a "three-bagger" in two years too. Wish I had hadLiatris Spicata-9/8/2000
1167PuddleGlum, Re: <i> Several posters have compared SFY to OIL awhile back.fp_scientist-9/7/2000
1166NZ has accounted for a portion of the recent runup. Tuesday's limp responsePuddleGlum-9/6/2000
1165Hello Thread, Lots of good things happening with SFY. Do you guys think there ifp_scientist-9/6/2000
1164I think we'll be at $40 soon.Robert T. Quasius-9/6/2000
1163Truth- I added some shares today, but I still don't have as many total sharePuddleGlum-9/6/2000
1162I would have thought we'd trade 700,000 to 1 MM shares yesterday and pop up TRUE_TRUTH-9/6/2000
1161I think we have a "demon convert" to thank for the fact that now we caPuddleGlum-9/6/2000
1160Thank you Mark, You articulated in your remarks, what I was trying to say in FloydP-9/5/2000
1159Well, a somewhat lacklustre day compared to expectations, but I'm not surpriMark-9/5/2000
1158Yes Robert, they are optimistic but also very cautious. The last sentence in pFloydP-9/5/2000
1157"We are delighted with the early information from this well.'' cherrypitter-9/5/2000
1156I sold some April $30 puts this morning. Now way will this stock drop below $30 Robert T. Quasius-9/5/2000
1155Most investors, me included, don't understand technical jargon like that inFloydP-9/5/2000
1154Here's the news release. Reading between the lines, Swift management is optiRobert T. Quasius-9/5/2000
1153Hi all, first, I'm celebratin' with ya... but a friend reminded that we Rich Wolf-9/4/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):