SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Applied Micro Circuits Corp (AMCC)
An SI Board Since November 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1805 111 0 AMCC
Emcee:  Dave Grady Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1180Some other thoughts you might wish to consider, unfortunately both are very posiDon Miller-1/15/2001
1179For your consideration, I clipped this out of a larger email I got from earningsDon Miller-1/15/2001
1178Jack - Good post. You know, I never paid too much attention to TXCC because everFR1-1/15/2001
1177<i>>>how much of AMCC's business is with CSCO? >Less than 5Beltropolis Boy-1/15/2001
1176TD, on behalf of this board, THANKS for the informative post. dcDrake-1/14/2001
1175Thanks a lot for your opinion and others' as well. I really do appreciate itThe Gambler-1/14/2001
1174amcc probably deserves the premium to pmcs for this moment in time. although amTrader Dave-1/13/2001
1173Well Amcc is trading at a premium valuation compared to pmcs. But pmcs might ristechanalyst1-1/13/2001
1172<i>wonder if I need to lower my position</i> Depends on your time Jack Hartmann-1/13/2001
1171>>Yeah, but, earnings next week should blow the top off it. But, then agaiThe Gambler-1/13/2001
1170Yeah, but, earnings next week should blow the top off it. But, then again, couldDBrian-1/13/2001
1169Technically - AMCC looks like it is running out of gas right here - nice run.Jimbo-1/13/2001
1168<i>how much of AMCC's business is with CSCO? </i> Less than 5% Jack Hartmann-1/13/2001
1167Question - how much of AMCC's business is with CSCO? People are shaky about FR1-1/13/2001
1166Sorry, Eric. That should have been..... Bloomberg: AMCC <Equity> GM -or-SJS-1/11/2001
1165<i>>Why AMCC & PMCS are not moving up today?</i> didn't Beltropolis Boy-1/11/2001
1164Oh yeah! <eom>William F. Wager, Jr.-1/11/2001
1163Eric, There is also a third dimension to this. It works both ways to/for the inSJS-1/11/2001
1162Why AMCC & PMCS are not moving up today?Kevin-1/11/2001
1161Eric, You might find this other link on institutional ownership useful. The liDon Miller-1/11/2001
1160>>Higher institutional ownership simply means that you have professionallyWizard-1/11/2001
1159Higher institutional ownership simply means that you have professionally paid leTrader Dave-1/11/2001
1158Thanks Eric in your other post the previos q had 4.8 instead of 74.8 87.5 is thPerry Ganz-1/11/2001
1157Ahhh...didn't catch the error. Sorry.Allegoria-1/11/2001
1156Perry, His numbers, due to fixed format posting, got messed up. It should be 7SJS-1/11/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News