SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
FORE Inc.
An SI Board Since February 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
12559 26 0 FORE
Emcee:  Pascal A. Mons Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
11809 Hey tim---YADA,yada,yada........it seems you're a big time trader and a savP.F.-4/12/1999
11808 If Len is right, maybe there will be a better suitor. If he is wrong, at leastMARU CAT-4/11/1999
11807 I wish every one would give Len a break. He clearly identified his post as UNCMARU CAT-4/11/1999
11806 I bet a sell at the open, and buy later in the day for a buck or two lower wouljohn dodson-4/11/1999
11805 If FORE gets whacked tomorrow due to a CPQ inspired market drop then it will alBrian Malloy-4/11/1999
11804 It was probably that d**n "unconfirmed" len, the s*mnab***h. and you P.F.-4/11/1999
11803 If there is nothing on the table before we open tomorrow we will trade in the lthebeach-4/11/1999
11802 Going to be a bad Monday. Futures are down substantially. Without any takeover jach-4/11/1999
11801 How about: "It's unconfirmed, but I heard there is a bomb in the theatG.F.-4/11/1999
11800 Joe, I have the new system. The comment on 3/31/99 was that with all the BOP buJoseph A. Aboaf-4/11/1999
11799 I have the old cheap system. The new one is different and costs substantially mJ. Plesha-4/10/1999
11798 Well, at least at this point this site says that FORE's whisper # is 12 cenjohn dodson-4/10/1999
11797 Joe, This is interesting. Is this a trailing indicator or a real time indicatjohn dodson-4/10/1999
11796 Sorry Tim. I have a great deal of respect for you as a trader but... Message 8Rich B.-4/10/1999
11795Tim Luke-4/10/1999
11794 <i>I would agree with Tim Luke [...snip...] The rumor I heard (UNCONFIRMEWin-Lose-Draw-4/10/1999
11793 <i>i have a rule on my thread that unless you can back a rumor up with sojas cooper-4/10/1999
11792 Re: .i have a rule on my thread that unless you can back a rumor up with some john dodson-4/10/1999
11791 things were much different back then then they are now....i have a rule on my tTim Luke-4/10/1999
11790 Tim, It's very interesting, this change of heart that you've had. As john dodson-4/10/1999
11789 Since the Buyout announcement the BOP (http://www.tc2000.com/privuser2/ii229pJ. Plesha-4/10/1999
11788 < Seems to me the rumor didn't do anything, and would have died quietly,Tim Luke-4/10/1999
11787 <i>Not that it is necessary to take sides on this issue but I would agrejas cooper-4/10/1999
11786 <i>Should anyone who has read the "len-lashings" now be reluctjas cooper-4/10/1999
11785 The dynamics of mkt trading has changed in a drastic way because of the WEB, vejach-4/10/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News