SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
LUMM - Lumenon Innovative Lightwave Technology Inc.
An SI Board Since February 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2484 45 0 LUMM
Emcee:  Currency Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1184 So what's the scoop on Afrayem? Good? Bad? In between? opalapril-11/22/1999
1183 I was referring to the production option after the 12 month initial run, not thlindend-11/22/1999
1182 ""IMHO, proof will come after the initial run if Molex exercises its Mike Hardy-11/22/1999
1181 Mike, Now this more like it. Thank you. You are correct that Molex has agreedlindend-11/22/1999
1180 Linden, revenues: --------------------------------------------- On May 19 and JMike Hardy-11/22/1999
1179 If Afrayem is involved here, that's good enough for me. I'll sell on ayn rand-11/22/1999
1178 <i>Linden why should i help a shorter</i> Look, I thought the poinlindend-11/21/1999
1177 Linden why should i help a shorter Many of your questions are answered in the Mike Hardy-11/21/1999
1176 <<Pray tell, what scheme am I guilty of?>> Who knows. But if it inDon Johnstone-11/21/1999
1175 <i>Read the 10 k and the recent press release</i> What 10k? Do yolindend-11/21/1999
1174 Read the 10 k and the recent press release Who is Afrayem? What do u consideMike Hardy-11/21/1999
1173 <i>Lumm has proven itself,imo that is why the stock has been going up.<lindend-11/21/1999
1172 Zeev comments on LUMM's financing is below: Message 12030778 Very intereslindend-11/21/1999
1171 Linden remember one thing floorless convertibles or convertible issues in generMike Hardy-11/21/1999
1170 Larry, Excellent question. There are myriad types of floorless convertibles. lindend-11/21/1999
1169 <i>I believe you are using the term "floorless convertible" toolindend-11/21/1999
1168 The difference could theoretically be in the motivation of the convertible holdLhn5-11/21/1999
1167 Richard, You are correct and I am in error. These are not <b>truly</lindend-11/21/1999
1166 Linden, I believe you are using the term "floorless convertible" tooSteve Landrum-11/21/1999
1165 Linden, are you sure these are "floorless"? I could be wrong, but my richroni-11/21/1999
1164 <i>Friends, LUMM investors, ask for your certificates</i> See #10 lindend-11/20/1999
1163 <<sell/sell short>> Friends, LUMM investors, ask for your certificDon Johnstone-11/20/1999
1162 No one should be buying at any level over .50 cents. The only thing that shoullindend-11/20/1999
1161 Future potential jay check out the rb board very active and informative more soMike Hardy-11/20/1999
1160 <grabs Windows Calculator applet and taps it on desktop> What's wroFred McCutcheon-11/20/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):