SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
The California Energy Crisis - Information & Forum
An SI Board Since January 2001
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
1715 22 0
Emcee:  deepenergyfella Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1190uh, sure Bearcat, and I bet Mussolini was one of your favorites too. what'sportage-3/17/2002
1189Hey - Ray and Portage, I bet this guy was one of your darlings in the 70s! C&#Bearcatbob-3/16/2002
1188portage, Re: <i>The slippery slope is turning into a torrent. </i>Raymond Duray-3/14/2002
1187States rights, Ray, until it doesn't help the big conglomerates any more. Tportage-3/14/2002
1186The new road to riches : bankrupt your company, make 'em pay you to stay. Pportage-3/14/2002
1185Ah - there is no arguing with the left - those who have must have done somethingBearcatbob-3/13/2002
1184Zeuspaul, Re: <i>1. Since when is paying taxes optional?</i> Raymond Duray-3/13/2002
1183<i>Tax them too much, attack them for being wealthy, and they just may notZeuspaul-3/13/2002
1182Senate Rejects Hike in Vehicle Fuel Standards By Tom Doggett WASHINGTON (ReutRon-3/13/2002
1181Ya'll on the left may understand taxes in simple terms! Subject: A GREAT TABearcatbob-3/13/2002
1180CALIFORNIA STATE ATTORNEY IS FILING CHARGES AGAINST FOUR ENERGY COMPANIES SourceRaymond Duray-3/12/2002
1179Energy Risk – Only the Big Survive --RiskCenter.com Here's an article on thRaymond Duray-3/5/2002
1178Cogentrix -- CoGen Tricks Hi portage, Something of a local note from here in Raymond Duray-3/4/2002
1177Re: <i>There was no cap. </i> Is DavesM as disingenuous as AckermaRaymond Duray-3/1/2002
1176<i>Currently, I think the State is fighting to keep MTBE in gasoline formuZeuspaul-2/28/2002
1175<i>In an earlier post I mentioned that the State Legislature rolled back pZeuspaul-2/28/2002
1174NAFTA: WE'RE HERE TO SHAFT YA, Chapter 11: Methanexed Hi DavesM, Re: <Raymond Duray-2/28/2002
1173Ray, I don't know about Methanex and lawsuits. You may be correct. I thiDavesM-2/28/2002
1172Hi DaveM, Thanks for the clarifications. I was unaware of AB 265. Curious abRaymond Duray-2/28/2002
1171Ray, Currently, I think the State is fighting to keep MTBE in gasoline formulasDavesM-2/28/2002
1170Hi Alistair, Re: <i>Are you connected with Archer Daniels Midland? </Raymond Duray-2/28/2002
1169"sophistry" - subtly deceptive reasoning or argumentation I just poinAlastair McIntosh-2/28/2002
1168Re: <i>Methanex does not produce MTBE. Their only product is methanol.<Raymond Duray-2/28/2002
1167Methanex does not produce MTBE. Their only product is methanol. <i> The coAlastair McIntosh-2/28/2002
1166Quincy, I got to the same article by Frank Green. That was the one I was referRaymond Duray-2/28/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News