SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
The Case for Nuclear Energy
An SI Board Since January 2001
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
312 21 0
Emcee:  Hawkmoon Type:  Moderated
 Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
12Saw that Fusion article... REALLY COOL!! And keeping my fingers crossed. But Hawkmoon-1/14/2001
11How much juice does the Internet use? Apparently there is quite a debate ragingSnowshoe-1/14/2001
10I doubt conventional nuclear fission will revive as a major option, but fusion iSnowshoe-1/14/2001
9There was an article in the Toronto Globe and Mail about two weeks back about NuStephen O-1/14/2001
8Yes, actually I do given the current conversion factors and the costs involved. Hawkmoon-1/14/2001
7Interesting. Thanks. You don't advocate giving up on solar I take it? Onlyjlallen-1/14/2001
6<i>The pendulum has to swing on these whackos eventually</i> Agree.Hawkmoon-1/14/2001
5The pendulum has to swing on these whackos eventually. In NH, the "Clamshejlallen-1/14/2001
4Great to have you over here Ray!!! That was a super article!! In fact, so supeHawkmoon-1/14/2001
3Hi Ron, Timely subject, thanks for starting the discussion. One of my favoriteRaymond Duray-1/14/2001
2NEI FAQ sheet: nei.org And the latest design standardization and modernizationHawkmoon-1/13/2001
1Alright.. let's take a look at the positive case being made by the Nuclear EHawkmoon-1/13/2001
 Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):