SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Anthony Returned the Donation
An SI Board Since May 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
445 29 0
Emcee:  MaryinRed Type:  Moderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
120 TERN was up 10000% because of speculation, and now it is back down because speceims2000-5/27/2000
119 Your question was answerable in the TOU, but I can't seem to find it now. TSmiling Bob-5/27/2000
118 Actually, when the SEC gets involved in a stock, all hell usually breaks loose eims2000-5/27/2000
117 rruff, maybe, just maybe..., shorts are not trying to "scare", they aeims2000-5/27/2000
116 Pluvia, have you done an internal soul scan lately? Also have you done a D&sunshadow-5/27/2000
115 shortsellers do buy the stock sweetheart----we just buy it at lower price that Boquacious-5/27/2000
114 I agree with your post. I was warned for stating that the Pretend Traders with rrufff-5/27/2000
113 SI BOB is it a SI violation if a post has been deleted from a thread (a member feminvstr-5/27/2000
112 Excuse me, I have a question SI Bob. When you delete posts as you did here onGOPbabe-5/27/2000
111 SI Bob, You obviously monitor certain threads connected to a certain fallen gurrufff-5/27/2000
110 PLUVIA, once again we agree to disagree...I think this pretty well sizes up TERfeminvstr-5/27/2000
109 Here's an interesting issue concerning Tony's claim to have given out &Pluvia-5/27/2000
108 w molloy in all do respect I am not attacking PLUVIA we are having a civil convfeminvstr-5/27/2000
107 Kimberly, Your attack on pluvia has nothing to do with whether a convicted felow molloy-5/27/2000
106 <i>Did Pat Mudge assist you (feeding you information)with your reports orPluvia-5/27/2000
105 feminvestor, If you happen to have saved Tony's nasty post where he says tPluvia-5/27/2000
104 PLUVIA it seems to me your call on TERN has no merit and it also appears that Afeminvstr-5/27/2000
103 feminvestor, Thanks for saving this post - I was going to respond to this verPluvia-5/27/2000
102 Fred what I find most interesting is PATS posts suggesting she is friendly withfeminvstr-5/26/2000
101 Get over it dood. <eom>Bud G-5/26/2000
100 very.....i'm intersted in more,, please toss more out when you dig it up. Stoctrash-5/26/2000
99 Interesting read isnt it Fred..eomfeminvstr-5/26/2000
98 WHOOOHAAAA.... "Hold onto your skirt Sally...Kansas is going bye-bye!!!&qStoctrash-5/26/2000
97 PLUVIA why was the post that Anthony wrote to you removed.... Message 13779126feminvstr-5/26/2000
96 <i>Is there such a thing as "e" mail fraud yet?</i> Yes Lola-5/26/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):