Silicon Investor - User Site Discussion - Generally Unmodera

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes
Silicon Investor - User Site Discussion - Generally Unmodera

An SI Board Since November 2013

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans
1604	78	0

Emcee: SI (no user)	Type: Moderated

Introduction Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
1204	Anyone want to start an informal poll on when SI goes off the air? Oh, it can h	1Coffeehound	1	9/16/2014
1203	I also saw Metacomet's post a minute or two after it was posted. And, yes,	TEDennis	3	9/16/2014
1202	reasonable response. Now you as the monitor, it would seem, would be a bit like	deeno	1	9/16/2014
1201	Is this a great site, or what? That Dmitry is just what the doctor ordered. I&	greg s	-	9/16/2014
1200	Greg's request to be removed as moderator was honored. His request that his	SI Dmitry (code monkey)	1	9/16/2014
1199	just curious how would you envision this thread as operating different from the	deeno	-	9/16/2014
1198	Dear Dimitry, I am so sorry that you feel my actions are "getting very old	greg s	-	9/16/2014
1197	Dear greg, Your request to be removed as moderator is hereby granted. @Dima P	SI Dmitry (code monkey)	2	9/16/2014
1196	Oh. Sorry about that. I thought I saw it as soon as it was posted. I wonder w	Siber	-	9/16/2014
1195	I saw his post and he did use the f-word. Not a FU but more of a "what the	Tom C	-	9/16/2014
1194	Let's see. On the Discussion thread we cannot make suggestions. We cannot	Siber	4	9/16/2014
1193	Metacomet banned for profanity? I saw his post the second it was posted and I k	Siber	1	9/16/2014
1192	Add Metacomet to the list of the banned on the "New Features" board.	greg s	-	9/16/2014
1191	I did that yesterday. But when a thread gets more than 1,000,000 posts, marking	Sr K	-	9/15/2014
1190	For what it's worth, I went to message #1 in the AAPL thread clicked "M	Kevin Podsiadlik	-	9/15/2014
1189	Well, yeah. Both "with" and "without" have lower case "	TEDennis	1	9/15/2014
1188	In honor of keeping your equilibrium balanced, the "w" in "with&q	Mark Mandel	-	9/15/2014
1187	** PLEASE ** do away with time stamps like "Last Monday". AAAAARR	TEDennis	3	9/15/2014
1186	I just now added "AAPL" to my SubjectMarks, just because I wanted to s	TEDennis	2	9/15/2014
1185	A quick review of the various SI-related threads indicates that the new SubjectM	TEDennis	2	9/15/2014
1184	Apparently you now HAVE to click on the logos to access the normal functionality	Kevin Podsiadlik	-	9/15/2014
1183	The subject page change has to be one of the worst implementations of total use	Mark Mandel	2	9/15/2014
1182	Until you mentioned it, I didn't notice the number overlaying the logo. So,	TEDennis	1	9/15/2014
1181	At first glance I thought the latest number of posts per subject weren't on	Mark Mandel	1	9/15/2014
1180	The new "SubjectMarks" page is interesting. We now get side-by-side l	TEDennis	-	9/15/2014

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):