SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
SLJB - Sulja Brothers Building Supply, Inc.
An SI Board Since September 2006
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1681 30 0 SLJB
Emcee:  Done, gone. Type:  Moderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1206Not at all, ruffie. Free trading S-8 shares are how these scams buy promotions aStar the Wonder Pup-12/26/2006
1205You're mixing metaphors skel. Nothing in the fax blast about S-8. In fact,rrufff-12/26/2006
1204Read the fax blast, ruffie. The spam company was issued 4 million free trading sStar the Wonder Pup-12/26/2006
1203The July/August fax blast spam for SLJB. investorshub.com Was it this fax blasThompkins24-12/26/2006
1202I don't see how I'm wrong. You've yet to give a citation that the Srrufff-12/25/2006
1201gee, rrufff, are you saying all those hundreds of millions of shares traded wereStar the Wonder Pup-12/25/2006
1200Has SLJB a registration statement that can be revoked? thanks in advance.rrufff-12/25/2006
1199In essence, you are saying what I say. Market cap is arbitrary. I expressed myrrufff-12/25/2006
1198rrufff - So, in summary we have the following: 1. You are valuing the combined Thompkins24-12/25/2006
1197Gee, rrufff, how on earth did this happen to these pink sheet companies: SEC REStar the Wonder Pup-12/25/2006
1196Well, rrufff, for starters you might check out the 100 or so "pink sheet&quStar the Wonder Pup-12/25/2006
1195You're lying about my posts exoskeletal. We were discussing market cap forrrufff-12/25/2006
1194Waste of time, tompkins. Rrufff still doesn't grasp-or claims not to grasp-tStar the Wonder Pup-12/25/2006
1193Thompkins - please do not misrepresent my posts. I stated my opinion of value IFrrufff-12/25/2006
1192rrufff - so you are not going to provide the details of how you concluded that tThompkins24-12/25/2006
1191Please Mr. Thompkins, or Ms. Thompkins, don't put words in my mouth. I suggerrufff-12/25/2006
1190rrufff - lets see where we are regarding the valuation of the combined Sulja lumThompkins24-12/24/2006
1189rrufff- I am perplexed at your comments and analysis on the valuation of the comThompkins24-12/24/2006
1188You pointed out nothing but your own issues. I gave a formula for market cap. rrufff-12/24/2006
1187I didn't advocate anything, rrufff. I pointed out your inaccurate ignorance.Star the Wonder Pup-12/24/2006
1186So, you advocate making decisions based on book value, particularly on pink sheerrufff-12/24/2006
1185rrufff-Tompkin's calsulation was book value per share. Yours is market cap. Star the Wonder Pup-12/24/2006
1184The physical difficulties of delivering the cement for production requirements htonto-12/24/2006
1183rrufff - I didn't know that the moderator was MIA. I hope that he is OK. rThompkins24-12/24/2006
1182Apparently the troops on the ground were ineffective so the moderator brought ouJeffrey S. Mitchell-12/23/2006
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News