SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
Complacency Indexes
An SI Board Since August 2001
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
1487 37 0
Emcee:  TechTrader42 Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1212I think 1613 was the .618 retrace. Also, the middle of gaps are usually good forPaul Shread-5/10/2002
1211Edit,,,, appears the gap did not hold. MontyMonty Lenard-5/10/2002
1210Yup, stopped out for a small loss, although I may try again at the 20-day (46.03Paul Shread-5/10/2002
1209Brooke and Paul, the naz and q's etc is holding at the top of that rising wiMonty Lenard-5/10/2002
1208Looks to me like you got dipped, using the CI's as a contrary indicator. DoeTechTrader42-5/10/2002
1207When the CI's move down, it isn't bullish, in my opinion. I don't seTechTrader42-5/10/2002
1206I think it's a bullish divergence that your CIs are showing more fear here tPaul Shread-5/10/2002
1205You be careful. The Naz up vol/dn vol looks bad. Take a look at them apples. DowTechTrader42-5/10/2002
1204So far its holding the 20-day and hanging around the 50. Below 46.45 and I'mPaul Shread-5/10/2002
1203There are problems, though. The kicking bullish pattern at that site doesn'tTechTrader42-5/10/2002
1202This is what got my attention on QLGC: litwick.comPaul Shread-5/10/2002
1201You should have bought QLGC when the Naz CI hit 0 a few days ago -- or to be morTechTrader42-5/10/2002
1200I picked up some QLGC right before I saw that post. Makes me a little less nervoPaul Shread-5/10/2002
1199Monty: The LT Naz CI is moving down toward 0. The ST Naz CI reversed direction TechTrader42-5/10/2002
1198AJ: I've been looking at that gap, too. That quote from Worden on the SAIITechTrader42-5/9/2002
1197Well, the way we're going to find out if this is real or not is what happensajtj99-5/8/2002
1196Bond prices tend to move inversely to the market, AJ. You can see this, of coursTechTrader42-5/8/2002
1195Bond prices tend to move inversely to the market, AJ. You can see this, of coursTechTrader42-5/8/2002
1194>>When the T-Bill yield goes up, P/E's need to move down in order to bVitas-5/8/2002
1193Well Brooke, in my opinion most of the gaps I see (including the ones one indiviMonty Lenard-5/8/2002
1192Brooke, the gap I'm waiting to see filled is the COMP gap at 1306-1312 from ajtj99-5/8/2002
1191Brooke, the Fed model of market valuation is related to the T-Bills. When the Tajtj99-5/8/2002
1190The Naz has to get above the middle Bollinger band at 1708, I think. Same with tTechTrader42-5/8/2002
1189Max pain is 32, I thought. It often moves a point above the max pain level beforTechTrader42-5/8/2002
1188Brooke, I believe the line in the sand for the COMP is around 1728 or so and NDXajtj99-5/8/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News