SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
FORE Inc.
An SI Board Since February 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
12559 26 0 FORE
Emcee:  Pascal A. Mons Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
12134bloomberg.com Historical Charts john dodson-4/22/1999
12133 Trevor >>>>>>T/A says, buy it and buy now<<<<Nicholas Rauch-4/22/1999
12132 Paul Johnson, an analyst at BancBoston Robertson Stephens,upgraded FORE from Mklin huan chen-4/22/1999
12131 Fore Systems Inc. Dow Jones Newswires -- April 22, 1999 FORE Sys Beats 4Q Vlin huan chen-4/22/1999
12130 I really don't know why you are so excited about this report. First, FORE ilin huan chen-4/22/1999
12129 P.F. Do you have your bets in for tomorrow. It could be a lot of noise that Trevor Goodchild-4/22/1999
12128 Revenue is up about 12% q to q and inventory turnover is way down from 1.15 to Trevor Goodchild-4/22/1999
12127 Net operating income is 0.44 vs 0.34 a year ago. That is 29.4% growth rate withlin huan chen-4/22/1999
12126 John, If we took the messages on this board as a representative sample of whaTrevor Goodchild-4/22/1999
12125 Looks like business as usual at FORE. These are reasonable numbers. No upside TechAlive-4/22/1999
12124 <<i>Are earnings that bad? First Call had .11, we did .12<</i>WTSherman-4/22/1999
12123 Trevor, Like many have said, FORE is not trading on earnings right now. I thijohn dodson-4/22/1999
12122 Am I the only one happy with this report. I just ran through all the ratios I wTrevor Goodchild-4/22/1999
12121 Are earnings that bad? First Call had .11, we did .12...no announcement of a dJeff Lins-4/22/1999
12120 Tim, I think you read something into P.F's remark that wasn't there. Trevor Goodchild-4/22/1999
12119 Got to through my 2 cents in. 1. I think ERICY will be the buyer, period. 2. EDZOO-4/22/1999
12118 Tim, I apologize, it was a stupid thing to say, and I'm stupid to say it wiP.F.-4/22/1999
12117 Count me in, uncomfortable about the direction of the Fore's price after thLuke-4/22/1999
12116 I'm really surprised people expected .17...I still don't buy that. EveArv-4/22/1999
12115 Had numbers been better - Gill would have had a reason to not be acquired - He Bob Williamson-4/22/1999
12114 <i> At least they made the .12...... </i> When you consider the rjas cooper-4/22/1999
12113 After including all unusual charges, FORE posted a loss of $207.3 million andAlex Raytselsky-4/22/1999
12112 Jas, we already knew this...should be factored into the price. Will be a non-cJeff Lins-4/22/1999
12111 This is bound to be well received: <i>The unusual charges in fiscal 1999jas cooper-4/22/1999
12110 Tim, Maybe you should stay on your own thread - seems you bruise to easy here!Bob Williamson-4/22/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News