SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Web Street Securities (WEBS)
An SI Board Since August 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1339 13 0 WEBS
Emcee:  Walter N. Schreiner Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1239 I WAS with them for 6 months or so. No longer. All I want from them is the daDeeber-2/14/2000
1238 And how long have you been with WEBS?M. Frank Greiffenstein-2/14/2000
1237 Ummm...NO. They only use US Clearing who is a joke too. I like the free tradeDeeber-2/14/2000
1236 Fair enough. Is there anything you like about WEBS as a broker? DocStoneM. Frank Greiffenstein-2/14/2000
1235 a) I have complained MANY Times. THey are MORONS there. They once sent my addDeeber-2/14/2000
1234 Then (a) contact WEBS to complain, or (b) switch brokers. Or maybe you you shouM. Frank Greiffenstein-2/14/2000
1233 Yeah MVEE sure has a large spread and low volume...300M shares and a .01 spreadDeeber-2/13/2000
1232 Webstreet is a JOKE. For them to limit traders in this way is rediculous, we hDeeber-2/13/2000
1231 "Believe me, they are saving you money by forcing you to place a limit ordLee Walsh-2/13/2000
1230 Nope. The problem is not with execution at all. They are doing you a favor, LM. Frank Greiffenstein-2/13/2000
1229 good advise.Tech Master-2/13/2000
1228 I complete agree TM. You are just begging to get filled at a 50% premium to thSam Nizam-2/13/2000
1227 <i>This is simply an admission on the part of Web Street that they have vTech Master-2/13/2000
1226 This is simply an admission on the part of Web Street that they have very poor B.D.Bauden-2/13/2000
1225 Why doesn't this suprise me!!???Craig Bartels-2/12/2000
1224 <i>For those who use WEBS service alone, this is a nice touch. </i>Tech Master-2/12/2000
1223 Boy, that's a nice touch! And who said WEBS offered lousy service? I happM. Frank Greiffenstein-2/12/2000
1222 An email from Web Street: Tax time is approaching and Web Street understands hTech Master-2/12/2000
1221 People should be responsible, they claim they are, but the first thing they do M. Frank Greiffenstein-2/11/2000
1220 What is this crap??? Can't people be responsible for their own actions??? Lee Walsh-2/11/2000
1219 The initial reson for the response had nothing to do with the valuation of it, Craig Bartels-2/3/2000
1218 The point is the valuation of CyBer. I don't care if Jesus Christ trades tM. Frank Greiffenstein-2/3/2000
1217 A little different, I have an opinion after actually trying both of these, you Craig Bartels-2/3/2000
1216 Opinions are like fannies, everybody has one. Execution speed at CyBer completM. Frank Greiffenstein-2/3/2000
1215 >>Why not? Schwab bought some crappy day trading firm for >>488 milCraig Bartels-2/3/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News