SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
INVX Innovex Comdex Winner !!
An SI Board Since June 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3029 21 0 INVX
Emcee:  Mel Spivak Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1279 May I add my list too: INVX, DYT, ALDNF, CHKPF, PERI, CPWR All these are well pav ram-8/16/1997
1278 Thanks Eric.... for the follow up... any opinion on AIQ software?? later JoBox-By-The-Riviera™-8/16/1997
1277 Here's a few stocks that I am long on, that i still classify as value stockRobert T. Quasius-8/16/1997
1276 >>I'm waiting to see if INVX runs down to the mid-20's and startsBUE, R.C.-8/16/1997
1275 <I own a number of what I consider value stocks - companies with relatively Dana Breite-8/16/1997
1274 I'm waiting to see if INVX runs down to the mid-20's and starts to bounEric J. Beyer-8/16/1997
1273 Short away, Eric. I'm looking for good entry point, and I'm being patieDwight E. Karlsen-8/16/1997
1272 Several analyst appearing on CNBC and Money Line this evening agree with you, cgmccon-8/16/1997
1271 Dear Joel... Since I'm on vacation and on a laptop, I don't have my QuoEric J. Beyer-8/16/1997
1270 Dear Dwight...I only short INVX on a VERY short-term basis. If you look at it&#Eric J. Beyer-8/15/1997
1269 Does anyone know what the current short position is on this stock? These peopBUE, R.C.-8/15/1997
1268 Diamond... I was referring to "volume climax" in reference to (SGD) Eric J. Beyer-8/15/1997
1267 >Frankly I'd prefer a volume climax between the head and shoulders >aTom Simpson-8/15/1997
1266 I own a number of what I consider value stocks - companies with relatively low Robert T. Quasius-8/15/1997
1265 Agreed here, too. It wasn't hurt any worse than the rest of the techs todagmccon-8/15/1997
1264 I agree with your comments. Why short a stock that made about $.74 per share iDavid M. Selman-8/15/1997
1263 >Mostly "volume climax"... Can you do this with your clothes on? waverider-8/15/1997
1262 Hi temf.. i was just playing with mark and he knows that... we are all gettBox-By-The-Riviera™-8/15/1997
1261 Joel, I feel like I have to support Marks post here...it may have been testy buTEMFASSBAL-8/14/1997
1260 <i>..so the downside is somewhat limited in my opinion.</i> So whyDwight E. Karlsen-8/14/1997
1259 im showing it crossing the macd line and it dipping below the macd oscillator..Box-By-The-Riviera™-8/14/1997
1258 That sounds juicy and pulsating.Eric J. Beyer-8/14/1997
1257 ( Off Topic )......Eric, PAIR's at 21 7/8....good entry pt prior to tomorroSteven Messina,L.M.T.-8/14/1997
1256 Just super-high volume/shares traded. I know that technical indicators can get Eric J. Beyer-8/14/1997
1255 thank you Eric. I didn't ask the question clearly enough though. the quesset-8/14/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News