SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics
Should NY Times Be Prosecuted for Classified Leaks
An SI Board Since June 2006
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
178 5 0
Emcee:  jlallen Type:  Moderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
128<i>Maybe they arrested my neighbor because he was a major cog in the "Hawkmoon-7/4/2006
127If it was common knowledge, why was it a FRONT page story?longnshort-7/4/2006
126If I want your opinion, I'll beat it out of you! :-)Lazarus_Long-7/4/2006
125If it shut you up, it certainly would improve the quality of this discourse.Lazarus_Long-7/4/2006
124Fools like you may believe that; the rest of us know otherwise. The 1st amendmeLazarus_Long-7/4/2006
123We'll see that it's delivered to their jail cells.Lazarus_Long-7/4/2006
122<i>This is all because of 19 guys that hijacked 4 airliners and flew them Alan Smithee-7/4/2006
121<i>If it was common knowledge, why publish it? </i> Much less on paAlan Smithee-7/4/2006
120If it was common knowledge, why publish it? Thought they were in the news busineTom Clarke-7/4/2006
119The New York Times should get a Pulitzer for printing what was pretty much commoRMF-7/4/2006
118"fighting this war"....THIS WAR.....I guess that's the neverendingRMF-7/4/2006
117Good idea...for a change!sandintoes-7/3/2006
116The same thing that happened to Billy Jack.Tom Clarke-7/3/2006
115What ever happened to Kreskin?one_less-7/3/2006
114Ha ha. No. I read. Have a jolly 4th. Im out of here. M2Mao II-7/3/2006
113lol Its amazing how you know exactly what everyone including the terrorists knojlallen-7/3/2006
112Yes. And the Nixon Administration didn't want the Pentagon Papers released. Mao II-7/3/2006
111You're not reading carefully....they never wanted the story published....youjlallen-7/3/2006
110<i>the First Amendment essentially trumps all other concerns</i> ItTom Clarke-7/3/2006
109Hmmm. The story in question begins as something "interesting" and &quoMao II-7/3/2006
108lol Nonsense? Hardly.....jlallen-7/3/2006
107Thats nonsense, as usual. It isn't rocket science -- altho the administratioMao II-7/3/2006
106Huh? Once the methods are revealed and dumbshits who read the NYT start squawkijlallen-7/3/2006
105Is that so? I think not. WH Press Briefing 6/23/06: Q In previous cases when iMao II-7/3/2006
104I think not. The Administration has been consistent in its position.jlallen-7/3/2006
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):