FRANKLIN TELECOM (FCM) | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks
FRANKLIN TELECOM (FCM)

An SI Board Since March 1999

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
2891	47	0	FCM

Emcee: Seth L.	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
1291	Ron, comedyradio.net	Gary R. Owens	-	7/3/1999
1290	Brett, <CLARENT 6.7 Mil in Sales last quarter 5.5 Mil in Losses.> FCM 4	RinConRon	-	7/3/1999
1289	<b>Very Interesting:</b> After closing up 70 percent on Thursday,	Brett S.	-	7/3/1999
1288	Thanks Gunther,We all know that FNET will achieve it objective In a slow but de	STK1	-	7/3/1999
1287	Good Post STK1. We (the longs) have to wait till FNET makes 10 mill rev.and IPO	gunther	-	7/3/1999
1286	Deception line #2!! rd	rd greer	-	7/3/1999
1285	I couldn't agree more STK1. But I think we're 12-24 months out before	BuzzVA	-	7/2/1999
1284	As a Very long Holder In FCM and Several Next Generation stocks I Feel it is my	STK1	-	7/2/1999
1283	buzzva i think i may reconsider my responding to these bashers. you have a g	mark garner	-	7/2/1999
1282	OT mark, I feel your pain. I used to respond to these jokers all the time. T	BuzzVA	-	7/2/1999
1281	buzzva i really dont get any enjoyment out of this. i guess i am just sick of	mark garner	-	7/2/1999
1280	OT mark, I really don't know why you keep wasting your time with these foo	BuzzVA	-	7/2/1999
1279	u r looking dumber and dumber with each response to me. do you have even a	mark garner	-	7/2/1999
1278	Just point me to the salaries then, that should be a cinch for you.	Noneyet	-	7/2/1999
1277	Tom: it looks like i have to spell it out. You thought you had latched onto s	mark garner	-	7/2/1999
1276	Mark your through with this because you cannot explain yourself period, or poin	Noneyet	-	7/2/1999
1275	i thought my explanation was pretty obvious. maybe i assume a certain degree of	mark garner	-	7/2/1999
1274	Do me a favor mark, point to where the salaries are carried in this table. THR	Noneyet	-	7/2/1999
1273	Perhaps you would like to explain yourself better Mark. is the accrued liabilit	Noneyet	-	7/2/1999
1272	the nature of "ACCRUED" means year-to-date. that means that salary e	mark garner	-	7/2/1999
1271	It does says this for salaries in the 10Q.....i.e. 9 MONTHS, continue on down	lostmymoney	-	7/2/1999
1270	this is the bottom line. you were wrong. this is accrued liabilities. in my	mark garner	-	7/2/1999
1269	<b> YOU STILL ARE NOT DEFINING THE PERIOD</B>	Noneyet	-	7/2/1999
1268	for 1998, you are retrieving accrued liabilities, not true salary expense. lik	mark garner	-	7/2/1999
1267	The reason last years numbers are listed next to March 31, 1999 is for a compar	Noneyet	-	7/2/1999

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):