Seagate Technology - Fundamentals | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks
Seagate Technology - Fundamentals

An SI Board Since November 1998

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
1989	20	0	STX

Emcee: Stitch	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
1314	Gus, Well, Sandisk rep›rted yesterday, the stock is up 25 and some today on str	Sam	-	1/27/2000
1313	SEG pays $45 million to settle patent infringement suit by Rodine. biz.yahoo.c	LK2	-	1/27/2000
1312	Now that's upward mobility! Very enterprising management too. SiC is the	Gus	-	1/21/2000
1311	Thanks Gus. I went back into SEG yesterday, on the dubious premise that the dis	tom pope	-	1/21/2000
1310	<i>my infinite capacity for denial has led me to forget it </i> Is	Gus	-	1/20/2000
1309	Hi Gus No, I closed my short KO some weeks ago. If was short VRTS, my infinite	tom pope	-	1/20/2000
1308	Hey Tom, Are you still short VRTS or KO? ;-) Gus	Gus	-	1/19/2000
1307	Is this the true, the original Gus??? Welcome back!	tom pope	-	1/19/2000
1306	Correction: I picked up the $1.00/LED price NOT from the Prudential report but	Gus	-	1/19/2000
1305	Hey Sam, $344 million! Even better. Sandisk continues to look good. It look	Gus	-	1/19/2000
1304	Hi Gus, Great to see on the drive threads again! Welcome back. Actually, on th	Sam	-	1/18/2000
1303	Manufacturers' backlash.... <b>As reported late last year by EBN,<	Gus	-	1/18/2000
1302	Amazing. SEG is still trading at less than the value of its VRTS stake alone!	Gus	-	1/18/2000
1301	Very nice looking numbers, especially when held for years. The only thing that	Tom Simpson	-	1/13/2000
1300	Mike, Great series of posts. Thanks for the link. Best, Stitch	Stitch	-	1/13/2000
1299	Rob, After 3 minutes research, I jumped in. Both companies seem to be in the ri	Z Analyzer	-	1/12/2000
1298	Mike and all, *This is completely off topic* Today I started a thread on	Robert Douglas	-	1/12/2000
1297	Maybe this part of the release did not sit well with people: >The Scotts Va	Lynn	-	1/12/2000
1296	Re: Slightly OT / AOL-TWX Implications for Broadband Thread-- I did a series o	MikeM54321	-	1/11/2000
1295	Re: SEG's Q2 2000 (ending Dec 31, 1999) Thread- No excitement about beatin	MikeM54321	-	1/11/2000
1294	Thought you folks might be interested in who is making some of your teat equip.	GARY P GROBBEL	-	1/11/2000
1293	Mike, Gladly. The assumptions I am using have changed a lot so a direct compa	Robert Douglas	-	1/10/2000
1292	Sam, I am looking for the same. A good CC and a run fueled by momentum and co	Robert Douglas	-	1/10/2000
1291	<i>"By my calculations, and assumptions, the disk-drive portion of S	MikeM54321	-	1/10/2000
1290	Rob, If they can make any sort of case for the drive unit being on track, then	Sam	-	1/10/2000

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):