SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics
Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever?
An SI Board Since July 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
13994 15 0
Emcee:  Catfish Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
13169 <i>"She added her mother's age with her mother's birthyear tBob Lao-Tse-7/11/1999
13168 Not to mention the legion of other women with similar or worse complaints. JLAjlallen-7/10/1999
13167 And all the "evidence" I've seen says he was guilty, including thjlallen-7/10/1999
13166 My mind is not closed but I have made my judgment on this issue. JLA jlallen-7/10/1999
13165 Whether he was innocent of her charge or not is irrelevant. He tried to deny ajlallen-7/10/1999
13164 ROFLMAO!!! JLA jlallen-7/10/1999
13163 Vulnerable in his innocence? You are not smoking green leafy materials tonight Tom Clarke-7/10/1999
13162 I'd say it is true that discussions fail for different reasons. I would votPiMac-7/10/1999
13161 All the evidence I've seen says he was in fact innocent of her charge. ThePiMac-7/10/1999
13160 A partially closed mind is a good thing. Some people have such open minds theirTom Clarke-7/10/1999
13159 Who the heck knows? But the irony gods must have been busily at work, it was beTom Clarke-7/10/1999
13158 J, is it your closed mind or your determination to keep it closed that makes poPiMac-7/10/1999
13157 No, Charles, Paula brought a civil case of sexual harassment. The charges you mPiMac-7/10/1999
13156 Darrell, I assume the bold and repetition at the end of 'Taxpayer' postPiMac-7/10/1999
13155 His crime wasn't sexual harassment. It was indecent exposure, lewd propositTom Clarke-7/10/1999
13154 Well, yes, Darrell I did skip remedial English. How many times did you two takePiMac-7/10/1999
13153 Brees, would this be a different thread if it could be shown BC was in fact innPiMac-7/10/1999
13152 You're right, JLA, platitudes can be too inoculous for a summary. To rephraPiMac-7/10/1999
13151 Well, we've already had a GRAND INVESTIGATION. This was never needed for deone_less-7/10/1999
13150 JLA, It looks like PiMac skipped remedial English.<G> Catfish-7/10/1999
13149 Brees, #<<We, I'm assuming, also believe that humans are incapable ofPiMac-7/10/1999
13148 Discussion and debate is good also and it validates what we see in life. I tirejlallen-7/10/1999
13147 Well that made a lot of sense. JLA jlallen-7/10/1999
13146 JLA, Moral relativism? You admit - in two separate posts - that you judge your PiMac-7/10/1999
13145 I do not think that the lawful exercise of one's right to support the candiNeocon-7/10/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):