SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics
Ask Michael Burke
An SI Board Since July 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
132070 347 0
Emcee:  James R. Barrett Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
131970Bilow is a raging logical fallacy and he embraces that as his preferred method oSkeeter Bug-10/3/2012
131969Tim, companies ARE NOT free to label their foods as "non GMO" BY REGULSkeeter Bug-10/3/2012
131968It's also relevant to the integrity of you and the people waving arms about Skeeter Bug-10/3/2012
131967>>If your 8 points are the summary, its not directly relevant to our convSkeeter Bug-10/3/2012
131966You forgot the "neener, neener, neener." "The greatest obstacle Skeeter Bug-10/3/2012
131965>>You're quoting research from another person. The only way of arguinSkeeter Bug-10/3/2012
131964What is the statistical significance given the control size? Be specific. HasSkeeter Bug-10/3/2012
131963I watched a little bit of it. If I was serious about watching it presumably I&#TimF-10/3/2012
131962<I> What was the smallest control group size of the Monsanto 90 day studieTimF-10/3/2012
131961<i> Why the hostility towards freedom? </i> A regulatory requiremeTimF110/3/2012
131960Assessment of the health impact of GM plant diets in long-term and multigeneratiTimF110/3/2012
131959...Some critics pointed out that the new findings contradicted other studies. OnTimF-10/3/2012
131958How do you know what it was - you didn't watch it. You condemn it without iSkeeter Bug-10/3/2012
131957<I> It is a matter of statistics. </i> And the statistical signiTimF-10/3/2012
131956>>but this if a legitimate criticism<< Prove it. Or are you just rSkeeter Bug-10/3/2012
131955>>Yes seriously. "The study took 2 years", is close to nothingSkeeter Bug-10/3/2012
131954The size of the control group alone is enough to make the study rather questionaTimF-10/3/2012
131953Not watching your propaganda films doesn't amount to ignorance. If they makTimF-10/3/2012
131952>>And with a control group of twenty the confidence levels should be so sSkeeter Bug-10/3/2012
131951>>Good point about the ad-hominem attack being gratuitous and not useful,Skeeter Bug-10/3/2012
131950>> I'll pass<< "Condemnation without investigation is theSkeeter Bug-10/3/2012
131949Blackout! Big Three Ignore Major New Findings in Fast & Furious Scandal [UPDlongnshort110/2/2012
131948CNN Exposed – Emmy Winning Former CNN Journalist, Amber Lyon, Blows The Whistle…longnshort410/1/2012
131947Hi longnshort; That was a great speech. It had a link to the longer version but Bilow-9/29/2012
131946Pat Caddell: “This press corps serves at the pleasure of this White House and Plongnshort49/28/2012
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News