SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
ACII - AmeriChip International, Inc
An SI Board Since August 2007
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2396 17 0 ACII
Emcee:  BarclayDonaldson Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1321Does anybody know the float?rhoshariasha-3/5/2008
1320Barclay, maybe they should state that he was asked to resign in the 10k also. rhoshariasha-3/4/2008
1319O.K. 10k has him listed as resigned. Didn't read the 8k. Thanks for clarificrhoshariasha-3/4/2008
1318Shane: The 8k says he was asked to resign. <i>On September 11, 2007, (i) BarclayDonaldson-3/4/2008
1317"Ms Windsor" is listed on 10k as appointed to board of advisors and Kerhoshariasha-3/4/2008
1316rush: It's not the PRs making the PPS go down, it's the dilution. The PBarclayDonaldson-3/4/2008
1315Stock getting near 52 week low. A number of recent PRs have made stock go down rushlong-3/4/2008
1314But that is Rhonda's voice. Ive talked to her multiple times to know this. notgoodatall-3/4/2008
1313Its possible Rhonda is not with the company anymore. Her title was President ofrushlong-3/4/2008
1312A company can not and will not do any significant business with you unless you anwest-3/4/2008
1311Try calling the number in the PR, the voicemail is Ronda's voice but the namnotgoodatall-3/4/2008
1310AmeriChip International Inc. Becomes ISO/TS16949:2002 Compliant 2008-03-04 10:1Pascal06-3/4/2008
1309This is just wrong. I tried calling IR as I have spoke to Rhonda Windsor beforenotgoodatall-3/4/2008
1308No need to apologize.tevet-3/3/2008
1307I will apologize for my last post. It was somewhat out of character saying she hrhoshariasha-3/3/2008
1306I don't call or e-mail IR any more. I have no desire to. I'm generally arhoshariasha-3/3/2008
1305jeepney: Try looking at sec.gov for SEC Filings, the 10K is out. Yahoo doesnBarclayDonaldson-3/3/2008
1304nwest: look at the percentages. For 2006, revenue was very small as you pointedBarclayDonaldson-3/3/2008
1303I was only targeting the O/S increase within the 4 month period of time pre-splinwest-3/3/2008
1302In normal circumstances you should be able to call ir and get an answer. BUT is jeepney-3/3/2008
1301A question for the board: Does anybody have any idea why they didn't p.r. thrhoshariasha-3/3/2008
1300nwest: I think you need to factor in the R/S to give this comparison equal weighBarclayDonaldson-3/3/2008
1299I don't think you are taking there R/S into account As of Feb/07 588,245,85Machinehead-3/3/2008
1298Just trying to see the glass half full. When you compare where we are now to lanwest-3/3/2008
1297yep...no LACC revenues...therefore no responsekezman1-3/2/2008
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News