SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
Alfacell (ACEL)
An SI Board Since August 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1533 6 0 ACEL
Emcee:  Gil Kempenich Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
133 I received an e-mail from a friend and he said that ACEL got relisted just befoGreg Kevorkian-11/30/1996
132 Caution: The following may be longest post ever on SI:Alfacell. Here is some iSam Fara-11/29/1996
131 Mitchell, homework well done. I'm not sure, but I think I read about somGil Kempenich-11/29/1996
130 To All: I was just introduced to the internet and I have to say I find it very Mitchell Jones-11/29/1996
129 Greg -- Sorry, no, I've not heard anything. I did speak with the NASDAQ deJohn Jenco-11/29/1996
128 John, sorry I put you on the spot about the shareholder meeting, but that'Greg Kevorkian-11/29/1996
127 Gil -- Whether and issue is marginable or not will probably have neglegible effJohn Jenco-11/27/1996
126 The meeting was very positive. All the stockholders seemed happy with the upbeB Michael Pisani-11/27/1996
125 John, I'm still not entirely clear. You state "...there is a 'prGil Kempenich-11/27/1996
124 Gil -- You hit the nail on the head. Just because ACEL is relisting does not mJohn Jenco-11/26/1996
123 John, I'm not clear on what you're saying. Is the subject you address Gil Kempenich-11/26/1996
122 TO ALL -- I spoke with Donna [Brasko] today, concerning a subject near and dearJohn Jenco-11/26/1996
121 Thanks, John. How will we know when ACEL begins trading on the NASDAQ? Will YGil Kempenich-11/25/1996
120 Gil -- The reason I had not planned to comment on the meeting in the first placJohn Jenco-11/24/1996
119 John, thanks for the dispassionate, albeit probably realistic analysis. I haveGil Kempenich-11/24/1996
118 Greg: re: "I am sure John Jenco will give us some more insight as he attenJohn Jenco-11/24/1996
117 Thanks, Greg. On another subject - does anyone know of other discussion groupsGil Kempenich-11/22/1996
116 This is second hand from a friend who attended the meeting. The relisting is knGreg Kevorkian-11/22/1996
115 Michael, did you attend the annual meeting as planned? What did you think? AnGil Kempenich-11/22/1996
114 Dave, on second thought, I'll give it a stab. If the price holds above six Gil Kempenich-11/22/1996
113 Dave, gosh that's a tough call. Depends on how much is sold and how the deGil Kempenich-11/22/1996
112 Gil/Greg - A little advice, if you would, based on your watching this stock sClouseau-11/22/1996
111 Probably valid on the options. The approval is certainly propitious for the inGil Kempenich-11/21/1996
110 It is to bad it is going on Nasdaq during the holiday week and I understand thaGreg Kevorkian-11/21/1996
109 As I noted a couple days ago, the immediate movement in the stock based on the CODON-11/21/1996
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News