SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
Inco-Voisey Bay Nickel [ T.N.V]
An SI Board Since July 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1615 12 0 N
Emcee:  buylowsellhigh Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1340That is fine and I respect your opinion as you actually know the man. I was basinickel61-10/21/2000
1339Well in this case it's an unfair comment. I've worked with Ray Goldie inMaynard Marceau-10/21/2000
1338From August 1997"There are reports that Sudbury will have 2 maybe 5 years inickel61-10/21/2000
1337From August 1997"There are reports that Sudbury will have 2 maybe 5 years inickel61-10/21/2000
1336From August 1997"There are reports that Sudbury will have 2 maybe 5 years inickel61-10/21/2000
1335From August 1997"There are reports that Sudbury will have 2 maybe 5 years inickel61-10/21/2000
1334From August 1997"There are reports that Sudbury will have 2 maybe 5 years inickel61-10/21/2000
1333From August 1997"There are reports that Sudbury will have 2 maybe 5 years inickel61-10/21/2000
1332"Probably like us they hope to buy more at much lower prices." I thinknickel61-10/21/2000
1331Inco sells almost 300 million pounds of nickle that they do not produce. They manickel61-10/21/2000
1330"The Voisey's Bay "Ovoid" has the potential to make many pronickel61-10/21/2000
1329"INCO's deep and high-cost nickel mines at Sudbury and Thompson become nickel61-10/21/2000
1328From Bob Fairchild back in June of 1997 the primary issue is pretty clearly encanickel61-10/21/2000
1327Another comment from Geoff,(Cumbrian)in November,1997 puts the lie to the bullshnickel61-10/21/2000
1326Geoff or Cumbrian has summed up the situation for us in a post he made on Februanickel61-10/21/2000
1325Speaking of company stooges!This Ray Goldie is most likely the same guy who was nickel61-10/21/2000
1324Speaking of misleading! What has "Cumbrian's" role been here the lnickel61-10/21/2000
1323Maybe the new federal Minister of Industry can interpret this for the thread. Kitskid-10/21/2000
1322rgoldie@firstassociates.comMitchell-10/21/2000
1321I have provided a link to contact Ray Goldie and his firm. firstassociates.com IMitchell-10/20/2000
1320I am not sure of the analyst at the Capital Guardian Group but know the firm welnickel61-10/20/2000
1319Nickel61- You have said "I thought this is why we had members on the board dblues145-10/20/2000
1318What is the matter Cumbrian? Lawyer got your tongue?nickel61-10/20/2000
1317Thank you DBBLUES for your important point. I had thought they could force us ounickel61-10/20/2000
1316>Glad to see that you have whore analysts that are as pliant as the super stadblues145-10/20/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News