LUMM - Lumenon Innovative Lightwave Technology Inc.

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks
LUMM - Lumenon Innovative Lightwave Technology Inc.

An SI Board Since February 1999

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
2484	45	0	LUMM

Emcee: Currency	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
1359	jjs64, Aren't you tired of making a fool of yourself. I just made you 5	RCDTD	-	1/4/2000
1358	Wonder what? Manipulated stocks, crim stocks, hyped OTCBB stocks, they all ofte	jjs64	-	1/4/2000
1357	It did not seem today that it mattered whether Lumenon was LUMM or LUMME! $28 o	Professor Dotcomm	-	1/4/2000
1356	MOLEX and CISCO are the only beginning of LUMM's relationships. From SEC f	RCDTD	-	1/2/2000
1355	Grey, potential competitors will continously pop up. That's the nature of m	RCDTD	-	1/2/2000
1354	Just a comment on what I have read lately, I know Lumm are working hard on maki	grey	-	1/1/2000
1353	Hi Jimbob; You should post more often! I like what you say. And I remember yo	Don Johnstone	-	1/1/2000
1352	I would like to extend best wishes for the New Year to all LUMM believers. I	jimbob9	-	12/31/1999
1351	The first sentence says it all. Competition There are several competitors	RCDTD	-	12/31/1999
1350	Why LUMM will be a big player one day. 1. Price 2. Low cost, quality, high yie	RCDTD	-	12/31/1999
1349	One step closer to getting that "E" removed: biz.yahoo.com Thursday	Glenn Petersen	-	12/30/1999
1348	Don Re.:"...The sad thing is that some, I know not how many, are turned aw	P. Ramamoorthy	-	12/29/1999
1347	don, well said eom freee	Mike Hardy	-	12/29/1999
1346	This company which participates in one of the hottest tecnology sectors and Cis	SKIP PAUL	-	12/28/1999
1345	Carlson: Thanks for your effort in contacting the company directly.	Lhn5	-	12/28/1999
1344	<<Can any of you prove to me that I am wrong about the "E"?>	Don Johnstone	-	12/28/1999
1343	I do not have a position, long or short, in LUMME, but I fail to see what the b	Glenn Petersen	-	12/28/1999
1342	Here is what LUMME IR wrote me on this subject: I e-mailed them and got the fo	c. carlson	-	12/28/1999
1341	Don; I have already given you the steps to see my proof, but if you are too ha	jjs64	-	12/28/1999
1340	Don you just may be correct. I am looking forward to 'E' limination.	Lhn5	-	12/28/1999
1339	Agreed, those institutions which don't buy or finance 'E' tagged co	Don Johnstone	-	12/28/1999
1338	Sorry, I didn't think I'd implied LUMM needed money. Perhaps I wasn&#	opalapril	-	12/28/1999
1337	<<Where is your PROOF tout?>> For you I offer no proof, for no pro	Don Johnstone	-	12/28/1999
1336	<<what I was told>> LUMM will be listed on NASDAQ. And money is n	Don Johnstone	-	12/28/1999
1335	jjs, i agree with u, the E has nothing to do with getting a nasdaq listing it	Mike Hardy	-	12/28/1999

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):