SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
Brokerage-Chat Site Securities Fraud: A Lawsuit
An SI Board Since June 2001
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
3143 54 0
Emcee:  CountofMoneyCristo Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1368Yes you did give him good words. I apologize. What more can I say except were Patricia-7/2/2003
1367I hear a lot of talk about "tuition," "newbies" and "I CountofMoneyCristo-7/2/2003
1366It seems to me the record of this thread is that it's unmoderated and I haveCountofMoneyCristo-7/2/2003
1365<i>Did you have people in your real world who talked about those people? ICountofMoneyCristo-7/2/2003
1364< I would say that traders who went into actual offices are different altogetDave O.-7/2/2003
1363< Why not be supportive of Oliver and give him a "Way to go, guy" fDave O.-7/2/2003
1362<i>Not hard for me to understand at all. I DO understand. Perhaps you'Patricia-7/2/2003
1361< do you believe in the laws as they pertain to fiduciary duty and fraud? >Dave O.-7/2/2003
1360I applaud you for what you are doing and I am sure others do also. People shoPatricia-7/2/2003
1359< It is simple enough for me to understand, and wonder why it is so hard for Dave O.-7/2/2003
1358Pat, I would say that traders who went into actual offices are different altogetCountofMoneyCristo-7/2/2003
1357Just a question for you, straightforward and simple: do you believe in the laws CountofMoneyCristo-7/2/2003
1356Dave If am sitting in front of my computer, in my home, yes, it is me who hits Patricia-7/2/2003
1355< Would you pay someone $500 a month to "make up your own mind?" IfDave O.-7/2/2003
1354I didn't reply to the aforementioned post because it didn't warrant a reDave O.-7/2/2003
1353< yes, he "hit the keys", but did so without knowing the full extenDave O.-7/2/2003
1352I like to make things easily understandable like the "other" Yogi, YogYogizuna-7/2/2003
1351Thank you also Patricia.Yogizuna-7/2/2003
1350>>> There is something else, also: it's obvious the defendants thinYogizuna-7/2/2003
1349<I>Who, especially traders, is going to give away $500 for nothing?</I&Yogizuna-7/2/2003
1348Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhh! I get it! LOLSpark-7/2/2003
1347What is of great value in this conversation is to boil down this complex scheme CountofMoneyCristo-7/2/2003
1346Yogi <b>Would you pay someone $500 a month to "make up your own mindPatricia-7/2/2003
1345<b>RELIANCE</b> Let's talk about this some more. Back in 1998-CountofMoneyCristo-7/2/2003
1344<i>Yes, and I believe your case is as different from the above as night isCountofMoneyCristo-7/2/2003
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News