Piffer Thread on Political Rantings and Ravings

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics
Piffer Thread on Political Rantings and Ravings

An SI Board Since November 2000

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans
14610	39	0

Emcee: Original Mad Dog	Type: Moderated

Introduction Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
13810	I really have no idea, but agree that it's weird.	mph	-	5/28/2004
13809	I am curious as to why Nick Berg would have been of interest to Moore. What wou	Jorj X Mckie	-	5/28/2004
13808	I liked the part where Moore's people say they won't release it to the m	mph	-	5/28/2004
13807	OK, this is just too freakin weird of a coincidence. <b>Filmmaker Moore O	Jorj X Mckie	-	5/28/2004
13806	Here's an interesting read even though it is somewhat dated:- counterpunch.	Richnorth	-	5/28/2004
13805	I may have made one yesterday <i>limitedmemory.com</i>	Rainy_Day_Woman	-	5/28/2004
13804	I think AS needs to do a better job about thinking his assertions through to the	mph	-	5/27/2004
13803	it all depends on what your definition of <i>if</i> is...LOL Actual	mph	-	5/27/2004
13802	It's a question of verb tense. Also, I wouldn't necessary have the oper	Alan Smithee	-	5/27/2004
13801	Message 20172645 I find myself agreeing with ted. (don't faint!<g>)	mph	-	5/27/2004
13800	Saddam's Letter Thank you for giving me the opportunity to speak my mind.	arno	-	5/27/2004
13799	This is too funny.... #reply-20171815 I just checked for myself....and it'	arno	-	5/27/2004
13798	<b>Franken for Senate?</b> Rob Hotakainen Star Tribune Washington	arno	-	5/27/2004
13797	tejek. While you are contemplating the words " we " and " our &q	lorne	-	5/27/2004
13796	<I>tejek. The author of that last article you posted " Carolyn Lochhe	tejek	-	5/26/2004
13795	<i>You said...." Because you were voicing opinions about the US and c	tejek	-	5/26/2004
13794	a tad here and there	MrLucky	-	5/26/2004
13793	tejek. The author of that last article you posted " Carolyn Lochhead "	lorne	-	5/26/2004
13792	tejek. You said...." Aw shucks, yeah......thanks for straightening me out	lorne	-	5/26/2004
13791	Hmmmmm. Sounds like you have some familiarity with with the industry. <ggg&	Alan Smithee	-	5/26/2004
13790	Bush speech alarms even war enthusiasts Carolyn Lochhead, Chronicle Washington	tejek	-	5/26/2004
13789	<I>Now here the word " we " is again used as a referral to You a	tejek	-	5/26/2004
13788	Gloop? Gross, perverted, obsessed, and deranged...just what you need.	arno	-	5/26/2004
13787	you are a very quick study! <g>	MrLucky	-	5/26/2004
13786	There are quite a few "honeys" who regularly frequent this thread. Pe	MrLucky	-	5/26/2004

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):