SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
Canada Carbon CCB-V
An SI Board Since November 2013
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1871 87 17 CCB
Emcee:  stuffbug Type:  Moderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1396The Miller project is a standout deposit that won't lift any others boat as NuclearCrystals13/3/2016
1395This may be halted for a while, so much information to review.Dirtythirty13/3/2016
1394Message 30484221 Once again a clear demonstration of the "inability to reathe Chief-3/3/2016
1393Well finally the ZEN KNATS will be shown how to get a mine up and running on lowthe Chief43/3/2016
1392Let the good times begin Woohoojiggydo-3/3/2016
1391And we're halted....Swiitch-3/3/2016
1390What I find hilarious is so far TCC has made about $6,000,000 in gains on CCB fothe Chief23/2/2016
1389Actually that was an explanation of how to amortize opex. In our case because outhe Chief13/2/2016
1388Chief says....mine life is increased if you extract ore more slowly!!!!!!!!!!!! WhelanBay13/2/2016
1387IF you paid attention i sold and told people i thought the stock would be fine apop123-3/1/2016
1386I notice its becoming more frequent now that a bid comes in on ZEN at the sametithe Chief-3/1/2016
1385I see Pops traded CCB for a $100 loss today but I bet his dumping of near 1 millNuclearCrystals13/1/2016
1384You have a better grasp on this then I have. Not disagreeing, just working with the Chief13/1/2016
1383Fair enough Chief, we obviously have a different idea on why the graphite is theNuclearCrystals13/1/2016
1382depends how you look at the project. If you look at it from a point of view of sthe Chief13/1/2016
1381never discussed or mentioned pods or sources. What I am suggesting is we have nothe Chief-3/1/2016
1380We'll leave this be for now. My view is that it is a stretch concept but I cLearntoTrade-2/29/2016
1379A poster from Stockhouse and I think a member of Trading Chief. The guy knows geNuclearCrystals12/29/2016
1378Is it a function of distance or rock formation/capture/entrapment during the purNuclearCrystals-2/29/2016
1377Who is Salty?LearntoTrade-2/29/2016
1376I would counter any potential "bias on her part" argument with companyNuclearCrystals-2/29/2016
1375Also, this suggesting the dissemination graphite does not follow a function of dLearntoTrade-2/29/2016
1374I realize Lauzier deserves credit. My reaching out to Louisa is for another reasLearntoTrade-2/29/2016
1373pretty much what salty posted to geeraf1 a long long time ago,pop123-2/29/2016
1372Learntotrade, I think you are not giving Lauzier enough credit. Moreno did not NuclearCrystals-2/29/2016
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News