SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
Incyte (INCY)
An SI Board Since January 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3202 131 0 INCY
Emcee:  scaram(o)uche Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1402 So the Two Headed God belches in our face: Pulled from CBS Marketwatch Janus tLighthouse-3/29/2000
1401 O.K. there went the toe. Now I have an ankle in the slightly red water. Good Lighthouse-3/29/2000
1400 Incyte Broadens Customer Base With Phase One Launch of E-Commerce Genomics ProgJF Quinnelly-3/25/2000
1399 Incyte Pharmaceuticals to Be Renamed Incyte Genomics See news below.opalapril-3/23/2000
1398 Now we have a Two Headed God after us!!!!!! sec.govLighthouse-3/21/2000
1397 Repurchased the other half of my holding today. Sub $100 just too tempting. Pronigel bates-3/21/2000
1396 I'm just keeping it simple, some institution is in at 100% premium to here.LLCF-3/20/2000
1395 Bid $111 for the 2 million shares back?? Nice trade INCY! Go baby! LOL . . .Lighthouse-3/20/2000
1394 DAK- Is it safe yet? There's still over a hundred bucks between this and zRWReeves-3/20/2000
1393 <Anyone want to start a pool about what INCY will do with their money?> LLCF-3/20/2000
1392 The smallest of toes is back in the water, but I am watching for the baracuda&#Lighthouse-3/20/2000
1391 Thanks, getting cheaper by the day! DAKLLCF-3/20/2000
1390 Here was the first bit: Quote | Real-Time Quote NEW | Charts | Real-Time ChartLighthouse-3/20/2000
1389 I was under the impression that the term "utility" with respect to paBiotech Jim-3/19/2000
1388 George, I don't think the number of patents is as important as their utilitA.J. Mullen-3/19/2000
1387 The Patent Count Here are the numbers as provided in an Editorial from the latGeorge Sepetjian-3/18/2000
1386 Thanks for calming a lingering doubt. By the way, what happened to Rocketman? A.J. Mullen-3/18/2000
1385 >>I wondered if it were possible that there was some language in the agreRCMac-3/18/2000
1384 "The problem will only come from unethical companies trying to claim they A.J. Mullen-3/17/2000
1383 Companies have signed up to Incyte's database on a subscription basis. Inctommysdad-3/16/2000
1382 RC, I remember you pointing out a long time ago, what today's WSJ states tA.J. Mullen-3/16/2000
1381 Also, great article in the WSJ about this whole gene-patent issue.... get'sLLCF-3/16/2000
1380 Bought back in today, as there is a serious danger that people might understandnigel bates-3/16/2000
1379 While I've long been bullish in INCY, let's face it when you start discLLCF-3/16/2000
1378 Some interesting WSJ articles from the GERN thread. Message 13214808 Message sim1-3/16/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News