SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
THQ,Inc. (THQI)
An SI Board Since September 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
14266 62 0 THQI
Emcee:  David Haines Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
14141Gohm, I believe you <G>. The way Thqi shed the past two days speaks volumeStephen M. DeMoss-11/10/2001
14140Chris, You didn't step on anything <G>. I'm actually feeling prettStephen M. DeMoss-11/10/2001
14139Secondary date expected is November 13 for 2,500,000 shares. Qquietstock-11/9/2001
14138Steve, at the risk of stepping on your mojo, i'm looking for a couple of dowChris McConnel-11/8/2001
14137Gohm, just to be clear i'm neither bullish nor bearish on THQI, just fascinChris McConnel-11/8/2001
14136Stephen, believe me, what i'm going through w/ THQI is really nothing compaGohm-11/8/2001
14135lol Chris, ok, look like i may have jumped on your case without quoting you proGohm-11/8/2001
14134Chris, Your response (to Gohm) was well done. I would not be surprised if Gohm iStephen M. DeMoss-11/8/2001
14133> When is the dilution to take place? Was it approved by the board, and if soChris McConnel-11/8/2001
14132> you must be out of your mind when you say high valuation is not a good reasChris McConnel-11/8/2001
14131Chris, you must be out of your mind when you say high valuation is not a good rGohm-11/8/2001
14130The secondary is still "pending" - there is no date. The "certaiquietstock-11/8/2001
14129In the low 59's today, while the market started turning down, I re-bought puStephen M. DeMoss-11/7/2001
14128Steve- > That someone somewhere would have brought light to the unchecked vaChris McConnel-11/7/2001
14127Chris, Your the man. Your input is very good. I was cocky and stubborn with ThqiStephen M. DeMoss-11/7/2001
14126Steve, i have not traded THQI in a month or so, but i wish had, it's been thChris McConnel-11/7/2001
14125Chris, I think I will watch for a while <G>. I did look at it a couple timStephen M. DeMoss-11/6/2001
14124Steve, you bailed! Oh well, i think if you had traded the volitility a little,Chris McConnel-11/6/2001
14123Chris, I guess I have to confess,eh? I almost took your advice but got 'greeStephen M. DeMoss-11/5/2001
14122Steve just curious what you decided to do. Was looking at free THQI research reChris McConnel-11/5/2001
14121Chris, Your advice seems wise. I will watch how Thqi trades today. If it makes aStephen M. DeMoss-10/31/2001
14120Gohm, Thanks for the advice. I did not short, though, on a whim. I have been shoStephen M. DeMoss-10/31/2001
14119hey stephen, congrats on your gain... if you have even a slight doubt that thisGohm-10/30/2001
14118Steve, just as a suggestion: 1. sell half of your puts now 2. buy some cheap 6Chris McConnel-10/30/2001
14117Chris, Thanks for your input. Maybe the selling today was a result of the Stephen M. DeMoss-10/30/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News