SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
INVX Innovex Comdex Winner !!
An SI Board Since June 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3029 21 0 INVX
Emcee:  Mel Spivak Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1429 Gimmmmeee some of that coffee..... or maybe it's special roast Big Kahuna Box-By-The-Riviera™-9/17/1997
1428 While having coffee this morning, it occured to me that in order for INVX to foAdelantado-9/17/1997
1427 not reading too much into it. just backing away from the conclusion that the sset-9/17/1997
1426 I wouldn't read so much into the co-authoring of that paper with APM. SurMark Oliver-9/17/1997
1425 Mark - do you remember a few months ago that INVX and APM co-wrote a paper on set-9/17/1997
1424 It's options week. It could be a good play to buy the Sept 35's if youMark Oliver-9/17/1997
1423 Well as expected/hoped, INVX bounced off the long-term trendline. Testing and nPhil Rogers-9/16/1997
1422 Because the F...king market is going to hell, that's why it dropped. Where Box-By-The-Riviera™-9/15/1997
1421 INVX is now sitting directly on its long-term support line. This could be a gooPhil Rogers-9/15/1997
1420 I have been fan (and still I am) and stockholder of INVX, but due to recent disav ram-9/15/1997
1419 Does anybody know of a reason for today's drop. Seems that the stock is tesRobert T. Quasius-9/15/1997
1418 << Thanks, Phil, for your analysis... Increased my position at $32.00. &gPhil Rogers-9/15/1997
1417 <i>Yes, I think up, and I think this is one of the best (greatest potentiDavid G.-9/15/1997
1416 Tom and Cary, I e-mailed INVX and received a response from Doug Keller. He diKurthend-9/14/1997
1415 Thanks for the reply. I too agree we need to watch the "one product compaKurthend-9/14/1997
1414 Good luck on your hope, greed, and fear:)Kurthend-9/14/1997
1413 Hi Tom I hate to err to the side of caution.... meaning....there's a lot tBox-By-The-Riviera™-9/13/1997
1412 Joel, I mostly work at night.....no distractions and more available bandwidth. Tom Simpson-9/13/1997
1411 HTCH's problems stem from a high dependency on SEG. I strongly disagree...TEMFASSBAL-9/13/1997
1410 Cary, I like your posts..thought provoking...thats good....I'd suggest youTEMFASSBAL-9/13/1997
1409 Tom.... more defensive than I like....... mostly cash, some hefty puts on tBox-By-The-Riviera™-9/13/1997
1408 >I'm thinking the FED has put this one off by injecting liquidity into &Tom Simpson-9/13/1997
1407 Thanks Tom..... I'm thinking the FED has put this one off by injecting liqBox-By-The-Riviera™-9/13/1997
1406 Joel, Depends on your definitions I suppose. I cut large DD sector exposure doTom Simpson-9/13/1997
1405 Tom..... Have you taken a defensive position regarding the general market? JuBox-By-The-Riviera™-9/13/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):