SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
IDPH--Positive preliminary results for pivotal trial of ID
An SI Board Since June 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1762 27 0 IDPH
Emcee:  Roudy Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1437 Bob L, Maurice, Scott, DMB, First, thanks for reviving this thread with excellPseudo Biologist-1/18/1998
1436 As long as you are dropping in on this conversation, I thought I would too. YoBob L-1/18/1998
1435 Allow me to drop in on this conversation. I am a physician and somewhat familiaDMB11/18/1998
1434 Scott, thanks for making that very clear and adding some extra information. ThMaurice Winn-1/17/1998
1433 Maurice, I obviously was not clear enough on this. The fact that a particular iScott-1/16/1998
1432 PB, Just on the FDA saving us from ourselves and doctors. They are boasting abMaurice Winn-1/16/1998
1431 Thanks PB, that was a busy ASH conference with lots of reading. Well worth whiMaurice Winn-1/16/1998
1430 Maurice, here is the (only?) easy answer; the URL is ex2.excerptamedica.com ItPseudo Biologist-1/16/1998
1429 PB, do you have an url for the ASH conference abstracts? Or other information Maurice Winn-1/16/1998
1428 Scott, We agree on the usefulness of FDA approval in doing broad brush vetting Maurice Winn-1/16/1998
1427 Scott, thanks much, this is great information, and the examples are helpful. GPseudo Biologist-1/15/1998
1426 PseudoB, While my doctorates do not include an M.D., I've sat in on a lot oScott-1/15/1998
1425 Glad to throw my contributions into the joint effort we're all making here.Scott-1/15/1998
1424 Maurice, I agree in general with your thoughts. The point, from the insurance Pseudo Biologist-1/15/1998
1423 PB, Don't people buy an insurance policy, read the fine print, and if RituxMaurice Winn-1/15/1998
1422 Maurice, I think your interpretation of Scott's post is correct. Off-labePseudo Biologist-1/15/1998
1421 Thanks Scott, I gather from your explanation that a doctor could in fact use RiMaurice Winn-1/15/1998
1420 Thanks Scott and Don on the techn(ical, ologic) explanations. Just one point tPseudo Biologist-1/15/1998
1419 Scott, Thanks for the great explanation on label use. The recent run up in the Roudy-1/15/1998
1418 Maurice, the FDA only approved Rituxan for the narrow use because that is all tScott-1/14/1998
1417 Don, just a little bit of info, but a doctor here in the haematology departmentMaurice Winn-1/13/1998
1416 I spoke with IDEC investor relations today. The XOMA deal was between Genetech Roudy-1/12/1998
1415 Interesting measure of Rituxans value. Xoma just sold it royalty interest in taknahow-1/8/1998
1414 FYI: biz.yahoo.comDZOO-1/8/1998
1413 Contrarian, Post holiday greetings to you too. There has not been much news aHoward Hoffman-1/8/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):