SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Compuware (CPWR)
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1627 27 0 CPWR
Emcee:  David M. Kaplan Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1452 John, I beg to differ with you. My comments have everything to do with the busChuzzlewit-3/23/2000
1451 Edwarda, Thanks for your excellent analysis. I'm interested in your view Paul van Wijk-3/23/2000
1450 Thank you, Edwarda, for really illuminating this question. By the way, just hojbe-3/23/2000
1449 <i>shorting yesterday after analyzing CPWR's cash flow</i> As John Finley-3/23/2000
1448 Speaking as a former shareholder of OXHP, Chuzz, I believe the situation there jbe-3/23/2000
1447 Edwarda, I see no cash problem in the sense that CPWR is likely to run out of Chuzzlewit-3/23/2000
1446 Joan, Well, I can't blame you for bailing. With the shares sold short builJohn Finley-3/23/2000
1445 Well, I'm out -- for the nonce. Saw that downgrade before the market openejbe-3/23/2000
1444 Aha! I think I've found the answer. It's called the saga of the magiJohn Finley-3/23/2000
1443 Beachbumm Yeah, it's just a game with analysts having far too much clout foJohn Finley-3/23/2000
1442 Hi John, I got up this morning and was sort of wondering why CPWR was trading iBeachbumm-3/23/2000
1441 The services margins should eventually get back up to the usual range of 15%+. Edwarda-3/23/2000
1440 <i>CPWR could have laid off the Y2K consultants; instead the company (wisJohn Finley-3/23/2000
1439 Chuzz, please see my posting to Joan on what occurred in the professional serviEdwarda-3/23/2000
1438 Good morning, Joan and Thread! When evaluating CPWR's revenues and net incEdwarda-3/23/2000
1437 <i>This analysis might lead one to question whether CPWR is being overly John Finley-3/22/2000
1436 MSTR??!!! Eeek -- you're scaring me, Chuzzlewit!jbe-3/22/2000
1435 Joan, I'm not quite sure what John is asking. Remember that revenue recognChuzzlewit-3/22/2000
1434 Thank you so much, Paul. You seem to have effectively answered my question abojbe-3/22/2000
1432 Thank you, Chuzzlewit, for laying out all that is involved in discounted free cjbe-3/22/2000
1431 John, I would be more concerned with the way CPWR recognizes revenue. The big Chuzzlewit-3/22/2000
1430 Chuzzlewit, OK, so free cash flow has dropped significantly and A/R has risen sJohn Finley-3/22/2000
1429 Thread, The cash flow figures for the last 9 months should give investors someChuzzlewit-3/22/2000
1428 Some information worth considering: CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STChuzzlewit-3/22/2000
1427 Joan, some numbers for you: CPWR has around 16.000 employees. The number is inPaul M. Rengier-3/22/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News