SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
Inco-Voisey Bay Nickel [ T.N.V]
An SI Board Since July 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1615 12 0 N
Emcee:  buylowsellhigh Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1465O.T. More Tobin and Canuck politics: Message 14879785Kitskid-11/25/2000
1464Nickel- Maynard Marceau on here has been the most vocal on utilizing Dissent rigdblues145-11/25/2000
1463"Jean-Raymond Boulle, a co-founder of one of the world's largest nickeldblues145-11/25/2000
1462I have voted against the proposal but have not asked for a dissent. What more wonickel61-11/25/2000
1461Maybe Brian Tobin with his new found ethical expertise can give an opinion on thKitskid-11/25/2000
1460I have voted no and sent my letter " notice of dissent". I would like Jidamo-11/23/2000
1459Well we all know we are getting screwed and Boulle seems to have the money to finickel61-11/23/2000
1458More reason to register "dissent" despite the complexities of doing soMaynard Marceau-11/23/2000
1457Inco May Face Voisey's Bay Court Challenge 19:48 EST Wednesday, November 22,dblues145-11/23/2000
1456O.T. Tobin and Canuckelhead Politics. Message 14869647Kitskid-11/22/2000
1455That Mackenzie & Co is a paid consultant to INCO explains the attitude I wasdblues145-11/22/2000
1454I successfully got to the correct area and was able to vote my shares against thnickel61-11/22/2000
1453The MacKenzie and Company that is listed as an information source for the so calnickel61-11/22/2000
1452Yesterday I spent 45 minutes plus trying to VOTE AGAINST this proposal. On my tdblues145-11/22/2000
1451Both the brokerage firm that my shares are at,Fidelity, and the custodian that mnickel61-11/22/2000
1450For those of you who haven't voted yet you may vote by telephone at 1-800-4Jidamo-11/21/2000
1449Vote AGAINST These brokers of yours sound like pretty bad news to me. However thMaynard Marceau-11/21/2000
1448I am not the best one to ask about proper procedure this time around as I have sdblues145-11/21/2000
1447What exactly is the situation this time for a vote? Do we have to vote against onickel61-11/20/2000
1446I don't know whether or not you are in the US securities jurisdiction or Cannickel61-11/20/2000
1445Voisey's Bay Headache Still Nags Inco 15:44 GMT-05:00 Monday, November 20, 2dblues145-11/20/2000
1444Not only are they paying brokers to solicit yes votes, they are also apparently dblues145-11/19/2000
1443Yes I knew this because I have a broker who is straight with me. However, as shaMaynard Marceau-11/19/2000
1442The offer will likely succeed, but the reason is somewhat insidious: Logic dictateevee-11/19/2000
1441I certainly agree with you. As I said before it is underhanded but also they seJidamo-11/19/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News