SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
T/FIF, a New Plateau
An SI Board Since February 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
2243 64 0
Emcee:  scaram(o)uche Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1493news traders are making huge impact. ride the correct issue, and rake it in fasscaram(o)uche-11/1/2002
1492news traders are back. doesn't need to be real news.scaram(o)uche-10/29/2002
1491>> actionable ...research on the more than 60 companies it covers I do hoscaram(o)uche-10/28/2002
1490I couldn't agree with you more. The best thing for a shareholder is for BTRNjayhawk969-10/25/2002
1489exactly after 3 years they discover ab against their own product hip hip houray.dalroi-10/24/2002
1488>>And why is this shocking (not!) immunogenicity just now -- after such antuck-10/24/2002
1487>>And why is this shocking (not!) immunogenicity just now -- after such ankeokalani'nui-10/24/2002
1486>> If so, maybe BTRN would be a buy if/when MEDI goes that way, or if theyscaram(o)uche-10/24/2002
1485Tuck: I don't often resent someone like I resent Mr. Dr. Pres., R&D at scaram(o)uche-10/24/2002
1484Rick, Given news about MEDI-507 causing immunogenicity in half the patients, dotuck-10/24/2002
14831. important resource, going forward....... jnrbm.com 2. I'm getting verscaram(o)uche-10/23/2002
1482was tempted to "pope" this. not gonna, but worth watching for a sentiscaram(o)uche-10/17/2002
1481Ah, I thought that name and tone sounded familiar. Sterling Financial is the sRCMac-10/15/2002
1480guffaw! (eom)scaram(o)uche-10/15/2002
1479<i><b>actionable </b>...research on the more than 60 companiesnigel bates-10/15/2002
1478At least the 9/11 whores have a little less depth to their pockets this morning.scaram(o)uche-10/15/2002
1477I may be stupid, but I haven't sold a single share of any pre-9/11 holding. scaram(o)uche-10/15/2002
1476Naw... I'm not short much anymore. Never did short any biotech that I can rLLCF-10/14/2002
1475DAK, So, you're a hedgie aren't you? Should we be shorting CPTS? Actutuck-10/13/2002
1474<i>....... encouraged by such luminaries as Casanova</i> continuingscaram(o)uche-10/13/2002
1473More bad news for biotech :) story.news.yahoo.com DAKLLCF-10/13/2002
1472<i>that I'm the last stupid dip holding a given issue.</i> Relanigel bates-10/8/2002
1471Yeah, I know. But it's more fun to think about devious motives than the altscaram(o)uche-10/8/2002
1470Rick sometimes the one below best bid is willing to take larger blocks so if ydalroi-10/8/2002
1469also..... what are the potential benefits, to shorts, of driving a stock to bscaram(o)uche-10/8/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News