SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
2011 Biotech Charity Contest
An SI Board Since December 2010
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
400 43 0 BTK
Emcee:  BulbaMan Type:  Moderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
150Ditto from Community Alliance for Learning: On behalf of everyone associated wiArthur Radley22/3/2011
149Just got a letter from Kapnek Trust..... <i>Dear Rick, We wanted to let scaram(o)uche72/2/2011
148Maybe you can convince Bulba the NPV of CVR's is $50 given everyone says we ghmm-2/1/2011
147GENZ SNY approach deal, perhaps $72 - $75/sh. Well, that's a small uptick ttechnetium-1/31/2011
1461/28/11 Contest Update Was it Obama bragging about the strong stock market inBulbaMan-1/28/2011
1451/21/11 Contest Update Biotechs, especially small-caps, had some wild swings BulbaMan-1/21/2011
144Did I win?? Did I win?? Ah, drat, damn and darn, some guy or gal named RRGE woscaram(o)uche-1/21/2011
143<b><i>Or?</i></b> Henri has a big ego and doesn't waghmm-1/18/2011
142I picked GENZ on the <i>assumption</i> they'll be bought at a smtechnetium-1/18/2011
1411/14/11 Contest Update Quite a few of the Contest portfolios came flying out BulbaMan11/14/2011
140rkrw does not have MNTA in his portfolio. Maybe he was speaking from the catbirdtom pope-1/12/2011
139"OTOH maybe this is the year someone knocks it out of the park with a 20%&#Rocky9-1/12/2011
138OTOH maybe this is the year someone knocks it out of the park with a 20%'er.rkrw-1/11/2011
137Tuck: Since RKRW has won the Contest two years running and both years he allocatBulbaMan21/11/2011
136I am wrong...I would have won the contest by allocating my 3 largest losers at 5The Ox-1/11/2011
135In the 2010 contest, I had 2 stocks that were up about 150% - both were allocateThe Ox-1/11/2011
134Isn't that like "rebalancing" your portfolio? Alas, when I'vetechnetium11/11/2011
133"To see if people can actually predict which of their stocks will do best&qtechnetium-1/11/2011
132A related question -- which would come out of the analysis easily -- would be iftuck-1/11/2011
131<i>Oh that's a fact. Meaningless from just one person, but my 2 - 20%eThe Ox-1/11/2011
130<i> it’s usually the stocks I like a little that do better than the ones ISteve Lokness-1/11/2011
129As you might guess, I’m not sufficiently motivated to go through the individual BulbaMan-1/11/2011
128Well, that probably cooks my entry, since it seems I made the classic mistake oftom pope-1/11/2011
127What I meant was a little different. Just curious to see if individuals top pickrkrw-1/11/2011
126For 2010, I did post a table which shows stock performance ranked by the number BulbaMan-1/11/2011
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News