Fonix:Voice Recognition Product (FONX) | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks
Fonix:Voice Recognition Product (FONX)

An SI Board Since May 1996

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
3347	45	0	FONX

Emcee: Dave Rebok	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
1522	Dr. White, << did anyone feel like they were led to believe there would	Randall E Westberg	-	12/23/1997
1521	I've been following FONX now for well over a year. I hold some shares and w	studdog	-	12/23/1997
1520	<<I haven't been in the stock since it was in the high sixes, and tho	john harris	-	12/22/1997
1519	<<I think I'll pick up a few more shares tomorrow.>> IMHO, tha	john harris	-	12/22/1997
1518	Randy, Didn't Fonix vow to never set specifc revenue dates? Either they d	Fairways9	-	12/22/1997
1517	Fonix News fonix(TM) Board Endorses Strategic Direction SALT LAKE CITY, De	Randall E Westberg	-	12/22/1997
1516	Thanks, Randy - your points are well-taken. Now, back to basics - did anyone f	Dr. Bob	-	12/21/1997
1515	Dr. White, Thank you for clarifying some things and yes the time of my post am	Randall E Westberg	-	12/21/1997
1514	John and Bob, I hadn't heard anything about the work order/ purchase order	ed doell	-	12/21/1997
1513	Anyone hearing that there is a delay in cutting these work orders with Siemens?	john harris	-	12/21/1997
1512	Ed, You obviously made a good decision getting out of the stock in the high 6&	Dr. Bob	-	12/21/1997
1511	ZZZBird: Your last post was much more appropriate for the Motley Fool board on	Hunter Trout	-	12/21/1997
1510	Dear Auf, Don't you have something better to do than criticize others'	ed doell	-	12/21/1997
1509	Hey Ed, you say: <<Hi Jerry,Thanks for picking up where I left off. I ha	Randall E Westberg	-	12/21/1997
1508	Ed Doell, <<From: ed doell Tuesday, Dec 16 1997 1:40AM EST Reply # of 15	Randall E Westberg	-	12/21/1997
1507	Marc, <<Also, the KLSE deal was legal but many of us believe it was uneth	Randall E Westberg	-	12/20/1997
1506	Mark, You wrote "If anyone could explain why they could be short and hold	Fairways9	-	12/18/1997
1505	Hi Parx: You wrote: <<If anyone could explain why they could be short a	john harris	-	12/18/1997
1504	Dr Bob, I'm with you but more so. Having met some management a couple of ti	Mark Cox	-	12/18/1997
1503	I've been following, Ed. Even as much as I don't like how these guys r	Dr. Bob	-	12/17/1997
1502	Hi John and Fairways, Interesting line of analysis. I wish that franco weren&	ed doell	-	12/17/1997
1501	Hi Fairways. You questioned: <<What kind of disclosure would be necessar	john harris	-	12/17/1997
1500	What kind of disclosure would be necessary if an insider's relative were sh	Fairways9	-	12/17/1997
1499	Hi Fairways: You know that I am short, of course. That takes care of X thousand	john harris	-	12/16/1997
1498	>>Question for anybody who might know. It is possible to determi	ed doell	-	12/16/1997

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):