SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Cityscape Financial (CTYS)
An SI Board Since June 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2544 6 0 CTYS
Emcee:  Nutty Buddy Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1544 As you know, Cityscape has to report regular EPS and fully-diluted EPS. Unlike Wayne Umfleet-11/6/1997
1543 Zeev: Actually the conversion price was fixed at a premium (not discount) to tRational-11/6/1997
1542 according to their public relations firm earnings will be released by the 14th Greg-11/6/1997
1541 First Call is showing the estimated mean eps for the September quarter is 0.43,Ploni-11/6/1997
1540 Sankar, I agree with you completely. However, investors should have known of thZeev Hed-11/6/1997
1539 Zeev: I think the whole issue of dilution is really redundant here. If the funRational-11/6/1997
1538 Sankar, I have accepted it as a fact of life that I will always be less informeZeev Hed-11/6/1997
1537 Zeev, The scenario I paint is NOT exactly the same as it was when CTYS was at $Wayne Umfleet-11/6/1997
1536 Zeev: The main problem with CTYS is that it has been a play between the informRational-11/6/1997
1535 Wayne, the scenario you paint with B&S coming to rescue and offering the fuZeev Hed-11/5/1997
1534 At $1+ per share right now, the picture is already bad! a further decline in prWayne Umfleet-11/5/1997
1533 >>There simply is no reason to buy this stock for individuals or big inveWayne Umfleet-11/5/1997
1532 >> * From your post #1501 "I think CTYS will be filing Chapter 11 ifShane Stump-11/5/1997
1531 Well I got behind on reading the thread and had to do a bit of catch-up. I haveWayne Umfleet-11/5/1997
1530 I dont claim to be Warren Buffet, BUT this stock is going to go down further bePaul Capozzoli-11/5/1997
1529 Chas, Positive earnings with a bounce to 5 or 6, hmmm, more like 2.5 to 4 I wort1^-11/4/1997
1528 Shane, "CRYS" would be appropriate, but of course it would actually Ploni-11/4/1997
1527 That is why I won't touch this stock for now (it still could drop another 1Shane Stump-11/4/1997
1526 Charles, <That would be good for another hit.> Beats me, but somebody wrt1^-11/4/1997
1525 Someone on AOL's Motley Fool board claimed to have spoken with the CFO yestPloni-11/4/1997
1524 Notice of Pendency of Class Action against Cityscape Financial Corp. and OthersTNH-11/4/1997
1523 I would agree with you normally, but a stock drop like CTYS has had throws out Shane Stump-11/4/1997
1522 Satish - actually, it is a double whammy. Not only the suing lawyers get most oBosco-11/4/1997
1521 Shane, all one needs to do is to set the expectations at such level that anythiZeev Hed-11/4/1997
1520 Since lawsuits have a tendency to drag on for years, I doubt the filed lawsuitsShane Stump-11/4/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News