SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
TS TELECOM (www.tstelecom.com): ASPIRING TELECO
An SI Board Since August 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1762 10 0 TOM
Emcee:  Ciao Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1562This is a correction to previously reported year end results. It shows that theCiao-7/18/2000
1561Isn't that the same as the release a few days ago? I wonder why it's ouM. Merriam-7/18/2000
1560TS Telecom just released year-end financial results. With an EPS of .699, why iCode Monkey-7/18/2000
1559Just noticed Felix's post on Stockhouse. In reply to his comment, all traM. Merriam-7/13/2000
1558Yeah, and notice the timeline: Nov. 18--according to Geoff-t, the HK listing haM. Merriam-7/13/2000
1557Ouch! The granting of options Nov. 22 is specially annoying given the trading pspeculatingvalue-7/13/2000
1556Steve, I wanted to let this drop but since you asked about more details on the M. Merriam-7/12/2000
1555I would agree that there are several factors hurting the valuation of TS TELECOMCiao-7/10/2000
1554With even a minimal PE of 10, TOM should be trading at $5.90 given today's especulatingvalue-7/10/2000
1553Not to condone the 10% of profits management is taking, but check out MAAX (MXA.Ciao-7/10/2000
1552For starters, they are siphoning 10% of profits off as a management bonus... Whspeculatingvalue-7/10/2000
1551Year end results reported today; stockhouse.ca Net earnings of 14.2 million foCiao-7/10/2000
1550Extremely well said Mike. The company's prospects look great. But that isnspeculatingvalue-7/4/2000
1549 Geoff, Thanks for the interest, however, they're not the trades in questioM. Merriam-6/29/2000
1548 I did a search on Stockwatch (a pay site BTW)and came up with the following insgeoff-t-6/29/2000
1547 I see that there's someone on SH who thinks he knows more than he does. HeM. Merriam-6/28/2000
1546 Well, Steve, all I can say is that something stinks. MikeM. Merriam-6/27/2000
1545 They had two prospectuses online - it was in the more detailed one and has sincspeculatingvalue-6/26/2000
1544 Steve, I just checked through 8003's prospectus and TOM's past news reM. Merriam-6/26/2000
1543 Good questions from the last two posts. I recommend reading the TOM forum on STomsr-6/23/2000
1542 <i>What's this with the director's gifting themselves 10% of any speculatingvalue-6/23/2000
1541 I still don't feel I got a satisfactory answer to: A) Why they didn't speculatingvalue-6/22/2000
1540 You are correct, historically Q3 and Q4 are the weakest. It would not be fair Ciao-6/21/2000
1539 Don't have all the answers to your questions. One response to your commentgeoff-t-6/21/2000
1538 Here are a few thoughts: On the surface, 8003's Q4 results look great. HoM. Merriam-6/21/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News