SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks
10-Bagger MINIMUM Rise from July 1, 2005 until December 31,
An SI Board Since June 2005
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
1694 48 0
Emcee:  SOROS Type:  Moderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1569Au contraire. <i>I never made such a claim.</i> <b>And evenrrufff-12/6/2006
1568AGIS was a "sure winner". It was a buyout. Read the filing. "Iinchingup-12/6/2006
1567Can you not read? <b>Do your research and come up with ONE pick which youcreede-12/6/2006
1566What a hypocrite you are. You first posted about a stock today and then wanted rrufff-12/6/2006
1565"That means it has to do in the 12 months is go 10 bags FROM THE LOW duringinchingup-12/6/2006
1564Now you're just repeating your claims. Let's get down to basics. If yorrufff-12/6/2006
1563"Weasel - you first mention a stock here today AFTER it has gone up." inchingup-12/6/2006
1562What Promoter inchingup fails to understand is that just about every post on thirrufff-12/6/2006
1561Weasel - you first mention a stock here today AFTER it has gone up. Then you prrrufff-12/6/2006
1560Once again. You are adding what you want to add. Here is what the header says.creede-12/6/2006
1559Show me a post on HMSG or HISC that you consider promotion? I posted both positrrufff-12/6/2006
1558You can certainly put down TAGOF at $.54 to beat LBWR gains by 3/26/2007. I'inchingup-12/6/2006
1557rruff: "You lie about posts. You lie about PM's. You lie about me.&quoinchingup-12/6/2006
1556Shall we put you down for TAGOF at .54. You mentioned it here, I believe, for trrufff-12/6/2006
1555<b><i>And even when a stock is a sure winner, the only benefit is forrufff-12/6/2006
1554You are a liar and it is convenient that you can't find the PM. You are a crrufff-12/6/2006
1553You know rruff that this whole deal started becasue I posted nothing more than finchingup-12/6/2006
1552"You're lying. I don't "promote" stocks.: During 2005 ininchingup-12/6/2006
1551Excuse me for not following up on the head threader. On 3/24/2006 (a Friday) thinchingup-12/6/2006
1550You're lying. I don't "promote" stocks. Why don't you finrrufff-12/6/2006
1549rruff: We discussed my trading style privately a long time back. You told me tinchingup-12/6/2006
1548"inch", you are premature. If you are going to make an argument, thencreede-12/6/2006
1547OK - you picked a couple of shells that did well. Excellent. You also picked AGrrufff-12/6/2006
1546"Why would you use .28 as reference?" I used it simply because that winchingup-12/6/2006
1545"inch", Why would you use .28 as reference? I don't think you cacreede-12/6/2006
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News