SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
The GUMMMy Bear Squad touting Gum Tech (NASDAQ: GUMM)
An SI Board Since September 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
207 13 0 MTXX
Emcee:  Mad2 Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
157 Dan, Several questions: Do you have secretaries assembling your posts, or do Phil(bullrider)-3/8/2000
156 <I asked a while back if anyone knew whether or not GUMM was stocking the shDanZ-3/8/2000
155 Yes I know what you mean. While pursuing for a clue on the financing of their rMad2-3/8/2000
154 Kevin, <i>For a long time I've been getting this vibe that there'Phil(bullrider)-3/8/2000
153 <I>from the looks of Bills thread it doesn't appear that your idea isKevin Podsiadlik-3/8/2000
152 Well Kevin, from the looks of Bills thread it doesn't appear that your ideaMad2-3/8/2000
151 Interesting Kevin. As you know I've covered my position, in hindsight a biMad2-3/6/2000
150 Since Bill has taken his leave of SI, for the time being anyway, I propose we mKevin Podsiadlik-3/6/2000
149 Coverage by MS would be a plus, however I wouldn't read that into the fund Mad2-2/23/2000
148 mad2, take another look at institutional ownership effective 12/31/99... insiMike M-2/22/2000
147 I agree, Mike. Taken as a whole the transaction was bullish in my opinion. EsseCarl R.-2/9/2000
146 Dan, were it not for the <b>taxes</b> immediately due when the optiMike M-2/9/2000
145 Thanks, I imagine GUMM will be a bit volatile going forward. Have you gotten aMad2-2/9/2000
144 Mad2, Gary exercised 100,000 options in December and sold half his stock to coDanZ-2/9/2000
143 I'm second guessing my decision to cover biz.yahoo.com I suspect well see sMad2-2/9/2000
142 Covered, average 27 1/4. Good luck, I'm sure I'll be taking a position Mad2-2/7/2000
141 Interesting. So much for science. This issue appears more and more like experMad2-2/6/2000
140 No problem mad2... acponline.orgStockMiser-2/6/2000
139 <i>So far, zicam is just-so-much snake oil, like zinc tablets, which haveMad2-2/6/2000
138 I've been running a few of my own tests...with 2 small kids, I also have loStockMiser-2/6/2000
137 I agree that if people have a bad experience with the product on their first trCarl R.-2/6/2000
136 Hank, <<<The key question is that out of all the cold suffers in thepz-2/5/2000
135 "What would others do?" Well, if like me they happen to try Zicam foHank-2/5/2000
134 Mad2, I think that you have severely underestimated the value of Gum Tech'DanZ-2/5/2000
133 Hank, I'm not so concerned about next cold season. Stocks react to the nexMad2-2/5/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):